Chuck Baldwin Endorses Ron Paul

I like the Constitution party, but their economic policy needs to be more libertarian, it's good they want low spending and taxes, but they're very protectionist. America needs to trade with the world, the gov't shouldn't punish that.

Baldwin is wrong about like 3 things.

cry :*( he was too good to be president :(

The American people dont like or admire sincere honest principled Men.

instead they only vote for Lying Frauds who use and abuse them for their vote.

America gets what they deserve, they vote for Frauds and Fakes, and they wonder why the Country is destructing and falling apart ?

AMAZING, sad but most Americans have  No common sense or intelligence

Yes, that is exactly what distinguishes it from a load of cum. Any other point would be ambiguous. Conception is the only place where you find a hard distinction from what was, to what is. I don't think abortion is a very ambiguous topic at all. At least not for the reasons you might think. But I would love for you to prove me wrong. Go ahead, what is ambiguous about it?

great, of the two things i don't like about ron paul baldwin proudly brings up. first of all, why the fuck does government define marriage? isn't that some religious bullshit? and also the whole life starting at conception; i don't see how that's a federal issue. i like everything else though a whole lot

It is the Federal governments duty to defend life. That's why. Ron Paul supports the DMA and the MPA because they protect states from having to recognize the gay marriage laws of another state. He wants to make it a non-federal issue.

k, it's good that marriage should be a non-federal issue and the federal government should defend life,but it makes no sense for the federal government to define a 'full living human' at conception and when it's embryo. Defining the pre-born as full humans is completely arbitrary and should be left up to more localized governments. if an embryo is a human, the why not an unfertilized ovum, or stray sperm cell, or compilation of carbon?

No, defining it as being human at any other point EXCEPT at conception is arbitrary. An unfertilized ovum and sperm are not human because they only have 23 chromosomes.

so it's the amount of chromosomes of DNA that defines a human? even though it has no awareness or consciousness and can't survive without a uterus or test tube it's still considered human over a load of cum? i dun see how that is so much clearer of a definition for human. but abortion is a very ambiguous issue, and good points can be made from all sides. that's why i don't see how it can be a federal issue