Red Alert 3 - Brutal Computer Destroyed
Loading...
5,292
Uploader Comments (YourBailout)
see all
All Comments (17)
-
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't 1080p imply there's a 1920 horizontal resolution, which makes it 1920x1080, which is "better" than 1600x1200?
I myself run my computer on 1600x1200, and my PS3 on the same screen at 1080p (in the menu, that is. Most games don't even have Full HD).
-
@nuclearfish010 By "Races?????" Do you mean Factions? If you do then it's "The Rising Sun", "The Soviet Union" and "The Allies".
In this video, they were both of the Rising Sun (The Japanese Empire).
-
races ????
-
No money for primiem
-
Should've used Fraps...
-
man RA really owns...:D:D
hehe when i first played this, i got confused with the gameplay in RA2 and Yuri's Revenge..
this game owns.....:D:D
Loading...
I dont know.. i dont think its brutal seems suspicious as you didnt show us the difficulty
RedAlert9211 2 years ago
I would like to post a better record but it's taking way to much time. And its actually saying Brutal in the upper right corner but it's impossible to see it :/
YourBailout 2 years ago
From my experience only brutal AI accumulate resources at that speed. I find it incredible that you won without crippling his economy
MrGronka 2 years ago
Okay, I will post up new videos in high quality tomorrow.
YourBailout 2 years ago
Wow i noticed it loaded twice as fast as it would on my Xbox 360. But then the lag and poor graphics makes me feel good about myself. This game on the 360 runs on 720 on multiplayer modes such as skirmish with four players, on 1080p for campaign gameplay and on 1080i for campaign movies. All are visually nice specially when two army meet on the battlefield.
tinmontin 3 years ago
Well it's because I recorded it accidently in 5 frames/second.
actually im running the game in 1600x1200, that higher resolution than 1080i/p.
With High graphics details (not the best) and I can easily run a battle with 6 players on the biggest map in that resolution.
YourBailout 3 years ago