expelled no intelligence allowed (part 10 of 10) PL

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
34,151
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 11, 2009

No description available.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @33LB "it doesn't HAVE to be unplanned"

    This is the heart of the contradiction: first you say God left it to evolve implying the origin of species to be unplanned, then you claim that humans could be planned. But if humans are planned then that means the alleged "unguided" evolution had been rigged towards an end result, so it becomes a teleological process of design guided by intelligence, which means that it cannot be considered a BLIND watchmaker because that implies absence of a plan.

  • @rickgigliotti It does make sense, but it still goes to the fact they even if we were created by aliens, they too had to have developed via some sort of system like Darwinism. But God taking a rib from Adam to make woman. Now that makes sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo­oooooooo much sense.

see all

All Comments (1,448)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Follow the evidence wherever it leads...Oyeah....

  • You know what's really unfortunate about being an atheist? If we're right, when we die, we won't get any gratification from having been right. And when Ben Stein dies, he won't exist. And he won't realize what an asshole he's been.

  • ok.....finally....that was a little painful to watch......in conclusion......none of the evidence that was presented in The Dover Trail was presented here.....i wonder why?

  • Dawkins will have been well illuminated for his stance. Ptiy he's such a rubbish liar though.

  • woot, ignorance only 30 seconds into the conversation... goddamn it Ben, 8 billion? holy shit, no wonder you think evolution says that life began by lightning striking a mud puddle...

  • @ClyneDDW

    What exactly is that supposed to mean? Seriously, say it.

  • Ben Stein is JAQing off (Just asking questions) and trying to make evolution look bad just because Dawkins is caught a bit off guard from a direct, non-scientific manner. There are too many grey areas in science to start JAQing off........same with conspiracy theory wacks masking their accusations behind "questions".

  • I found this documentary to be very frustrating. All they did is show people being upset that they can't say "Inellegent design" in their scientific papers. I would have liked to hear their proof or even their scientific theory as to why they believe there is intellegent design involved. And the demonizing of the theory of evolution only added to my frustration. I shouldn't believe in evolution because Hitler did? Bullshit! I should say- one shouldn't believe in God because Jim Jones did? no.

  • This movie reminds me of the Scopes Monkey Trial. In 1925 Tennesse's Butler Act made it unlawful to teach evolution in public schools, since it denies the creation story taught in the Bible. Biology teacher John Scopes was put on trial for teaching evolution to his students. Nearly a century later we have creationists playing the victim card and howling for not getting enough academic freedom. I bet if we went back to the days of the Scopes Trial, Ben Steins wouldn't have made this documentary.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more