Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

George Smoot: The design of the universe

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
221,269
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 21, 2008

http://www.ted.com At Serious Play 2008, astrophysicist George Smoot shows stunning new images from deep-space surveys, and prods us to ponder how the cosmos -- with its giant webs of dark matter and mysterious gaping voids -- got built this way.

  • likes, 69 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • 11:04 kind of looks like brain nuerons or human tissue of some sort.

  • I dont understand why theres so many religious ppl needing to make problems with stupid coments... I mean, lets say there IS a God, if He actually gave us brains and the ability to wonder and explore things, I dont think what ppl are doing (science) is a bad thing, and im pretty sure our creater would love to see us explore what he made for us anyway >-< and im pretty sure ppl in here know about religion already so no need to tell them the "messages"...

see all

All Comments (1,146)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • to those few dislikes, check your credentials before clicking any buttons!

  • My bet is we are a part of some other living being. Our whole universe is a small part of how this creature/thing works. Its like us looking at reactions that occur in the stomach during digestion. To us, its fast and small. For the 'greater' whole, its also the same. Universes probably happen all the time, and they probably call it a chemical reaction or something =p

  • @FallofDarkness55 well if that is the case, god is not christ. Christ is just a poorly thought - out human imagination. The god you are talking about is something much greater, and definately not affliated with the bible.

  • @studiousx3 no, its not you retard.

  • @nathanlief that's not a christian way of life. That's a lawful way of life. Christians are known to kill, to hate, and to discriminate.

  • @gearsiborg Your statement presumes quite a bit that is missing from the evidence. First, you presume that all of the vast emptiness of space serves no purpose. You have no data to support that statement. Second, you fail to consider that the emptiness of space might be necessary for the non-empty "stuff" to function correctly. Third, you presume that no intelligent Creator would make so much emptiness; again, you have no data to support that statement. That is an unscientific opinion.

  • Very interesting

  • @GrandIsClutch but only if thou have conducted intensive peer review.

  • Great..but he talk to fast

  • @wheelori814 11:20 Just went to psyche biology lecture yesterday and thought that same thing (:

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more