Panel Discussion on Morality at Beyond Belief 2008 Part 1

Another thought provoking talk at Beyond Belief: Candles in the dark.
Panel: This is Your Brain on Morality

With Jonathan Haidt, Sam Harris, Jonathan Glover, Marco Iacoboni, and Patricia Churchland
Moderated by Roger Bingham

http://thesciencenetwork.org/programs/beyond-belief-candles-in-the-dark


The subscribe button changes color if you click on it. If you don't believe me, then try it for yourself.
;-)

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Beyond
• Belief
• science
• network
• Sam
• Harris
• morality
• philosophy
• neuroscience
• social
• biology
• evolution

[adwaith2neo]

Hi dude...

Thanks for uploading...

[riversonthemoon]

You're welcome.

[polymath7]

I don't ordinarily make such trivial comments, but I get the distinct impression that attractive dark haired woman at the beginning of the video is attracted to Sam.

[riversonthemoon]

LOL.

Very astute observation. I think it might be her unblinking stare, head cocked sideways and fidgeting hands.

She is Nita Farahany, a very beautiful and smart woman who is into quite diverse fields. She looks at how our biology and genetics is related to criminal behaviour.

If you're interested, she also speaks at this conference and I could post it here for discussion.

[polymath7]

Please do, I am indeed interested.

I have, as it happens, a marked fondness for smart and beautiful women -more or less in that order.

I'd have replied much sooner, but I've only just discovered your response in returning to this video.

[riversonthemoon]

No problem. It will be up later tonight. (by which I mean this morning in the States)

Anything for my subscribers.

Well, almost anything.

:)

[Foulacy]

everyone always goes after sam in these things hahaha.

[derwinc]

in the interest of supposedly free and open and objective debate -- why is Haidt's response cut short at the end of the video?

[jaggerlags]

@nVei06 Unfortunately I saw this post of yours too and now realize you are driven by what seems to be a defense of Jesus. It's too bad that's kept you so unhappy on this topic. If you really think Sam wants to lead human beings to evil overlords than you're just another catholic whose mind is in the gutter of sin and fear, assuming the worst in all that they see. Excuse me, I've got an appointment with an evil overlord...

[jaggerlags]

@nVei06 You said if humanity is a random occurrence than all moral substance is random too. You should stop and realize the non sequitur at the base of your argument.

[KenMacMillan]

Government should not be involved in social policy at all.

[dweeper1020]

Does anyone know what paper sam harris is talking about at 8:20?

That paper seems to vindicate something that i have long such seen, that is, white guilt is more heavily laden in white-left leaning people than white right-leaning people. As such, white left-leaning people will sometimes act in a way that actively discriminates against other white people.

[dweeper1020]

I *love* how sam harris refutes jonathan at 6:24 when jonathan suggests that the happiest people are right-wing conservatists

there are just so many confounding variables and sam cuts right to it by killing his argument by stating that denmark, an essentially atheistic culture, is rated the happiest

that's what years of education in philosophy can do for you: perfect your reasoning skills so you think rationally and intelligently

love sam harris ... too bad he's straight ... ;)

[TimothyRiches]

@nVei06: Empiricism is dead. The funeral was ages ago. Didn't you get your invitation?

Also, your use of the word random is where you're derailing yourself. You can get past this block in your reasoning by boning up on what truly constitutes randomness. You'll quickly discover that there is NOTHING random about humanity's existence, nor their shared system of ethics commonly referred to as 'morals.'

[nVei06]

so who shall dictate the doctrines of morals in the embrace of randomness? we are cold atoms and cells only imagineing any value. the cold desicion of the council of Godlessness is valid. where does sam want to lead his people? to hands of evil overlords who an brazen and zealous in the coldness of their decisions? his crusade to extract the humanity from the human being is naive and vulgar crusade. that is our enemy. the enemy of Jesus is the enemy of man.

[nVei06]

he cannot hold the ball. if humanity is a random occurance, you have to say, that all moral substance is random too. of course. what we think is moral is even just a random notion without any real validation. we think it's better to have clothes and eat soy instead of eat our slow moving babies. you have to embrace societies untility, and understand that it is that which makes up ones moral codex.

[nVei06]

this guys isn't completely as dense as he seemed before. the sad thing is, we really don't have a new generation of intellectuals. we have a group that was crafted by design and intention, while everyone else was contemplating peace benevolence and the passing of time in leisure. we had a group of unscrupulous people looking to have socialist dogmatic dictatorship. here we see everything slip by. he talks about the progress of man and the value of morals in a synthetic experience.