Pro-Choicers IGNORE 2nd Grade Science Lesson!

Science Matters #4: Josh is sick of debating grade school-level biology with pro-choicers.

If a pro-choicer meets Josh's challenge at the end, he will shut down this YouTube channel, currently the 4th most subscribed pro-life channel on YouTube.

Supporting Links:

California Department of Education Science Content Standards:
http://tinyurl.com/ykz43xm

Peter Singer quote:
Peter Singer and Helga Kuhse. Bioethics: An Anthology.
2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
http://tinyurl.com/yzmupt7

Sumner quote:
Wayne Sumner. Abortion and Moral Theory. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press, 1981.
http://tinyurl.com/yh64mnr

Planned Parenthood vs. Rounds
http://tinyurl.com/ykzvflq
(I quoted from pages 37-38.)

A few more quotes:

"The beginning of a single human life is from a biological point of view a simple and straightforward matter - the beginning is conception."
Source: Dr. Watson A. Bowes of the University of Colorado Medical School at the Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, Report, 97th Congress, 1st Session, 1981.

The final U.S. Senate report from those hearings states, "Physicians, biologists, and other scientists
agree that conception marks the beginning of the life of a human being - a being that is alive and is a
member of the human species. There is overwhelming agreement on this point in countless medical,
biological, and scientific writings."
Source: Subcommittee on Separation of Powers, Ibid.

Follow us on Twitter:
http://Twitter.com/ProLifePodcast

Josh's brutally honest podcast on abortion/stem cell:
http://ProLifePodcast.net

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• science
• matters
• josh
• brahm
• prolife
• pro-life
• prochoice
• pro-choice
• biology
• smarther
• than
• 5th
• grader
• ethics
• abortion
• fetal
• development
• fetus
• embryo
• life
• planned
• parenthood
• rounds
• biogenesis
• human
• being
• california
• content
• standards
• department
• of
• education
• homo
• sapiens
• peter
• singer
• wayne
• sumner
• bioethics
• anthology
• moral
• theory
• south
• dakota
• district
• court
• rant
• funny
• flat
• earth
• society
• relativism
• debate
• argument

[Paragon468]

@durburgle That's theory. This is fact.

[ShiroiNihonjin]

@HAPrime You did not specify, so I'm not sure whether you meant this or not, but this is what most pro-choicers believe. "I don't think anyone should tell me what to do with my body." The problem with this statement is that it's not your body that you're terminating. It's your own child's. If someone doesn't live until they are able to live on their own, then everyone in the world is dead. Through your entire life, you are dependent on others for survival. I hope you have a good day.

[jj4christ]

@FinerThingInLife1 Morals are not man made, there are Truth. There is Divine Law and Natural Law. Most cases where a mother is struggling with caring a child full term are treatable. No one asks the question if the child within the womb should be executed through no fault of there own. I have 6 auto-immune diseases. At one point in my life I did not support live when a mothers live is in danger. But truly it is better for the soul of the mother for her to protect and cherish the live within her.

[HAPrime]

I am pro-choice and I never said a fetus or zygote is not human in the physical or biological sense. It is 100% human DNA and human cells. But I still think that it is ok to terminate the pregnancy through abortion. It is a difference of opinion between you and me, I hope you have a good day.

[durburgle]

Maybe it's time you read some college level books about evolution.

[FinerThingInLife1]

@jj4christ Do we have or give choice depending on the morality of the majority or where did our morality to say this is right or wrong come from in the first place? Do we have the right morals in saying what is right even if it hurts someone else?

[FinerThingInLife1]

@jj4christ A right to life is a choice people make every day. If there was no way to die from another human being, then the choice would always be life. If the core right on this Earth for humans is life, do we take the right away to death? We would have to take the coexistence away. Fetus are not only considered property of the mother (as to nurture for or discard of) they are able to end up as property of Government who are also able to take or give that life a chance. So I ask this

[FinerThingInLife1]

@jj4christ There are cases out there where the baby can end up harming the mother or ending up hurting itself and dying in the womb to which we can not deny either, there will be pros and cons to a mother bearing a child.

[FinerThingInLife1]

@huskerfraz Every human has a fundamental right to life yet, why is it in many places across the world that right is taken away by Government and State? The death penalty for example as well as Government issued assassinations? I am simply pointing out that rights that humans have are taken away, chosen, given and expire every day to which human rights to life are a choice in this world. That is a sad truth that has happened through history of our race. I accept all truths between us

[RyleyAshford]

@jj4christ This is potentially true! But can you make it happen based purely on the concept that I am a potential cold-blooded killer? You cannot with self-conviction. Murder is not exclusive to the willing: it's in our genes, much how it is in the instinctive genes of all carnivorous animals.

I am a potential murderer in the same way a fetus is a potential person. Is that a worthy excuse of conviction, because I'm willing and able yet unfulfilled? I think not, without specific aspiration.