Top Comments
All Comments (1,334)
-
@HAPrime You did not specify, so I'm not sure whether you meant this or not, but this is what most pro-choicers believe. "I don't think anyone should tell me what to do with my body." The problem with this statement is that it's not your body that you're terminating. It's your own child's. If someone doesn't live until they are able to live on their own, then everyone in the world is dead. Through your entire life, you are dependent on others for survival. I hope you have a good day.
-
@FinerThingInLife1 Morals are not man made, there are Truth. There is Divine Law and Natural Law. Most cases where a mother is struggling with caring a child full term are treatable. No one asks the question if the child within the womb should be executed through no fault of there own. I have 6 auto-immune diseases. At one point in my life I did not support live when a mothers live is in danger. But truly it is better for the soul of the mother for her to protect and cherish the live within her.
-
I am pro-choice and I never said a fetus or zygote is not human in the physical or biological sense. It is 100% human DNA and human cells. But I still think that it is ok to terminate the pregnancy through abortion. It is a difference of opinion between you and me, I hope you have a good day.
-
Maybe it's time you read some college level books about evolution.
-
@jj4christ Do we have or give choice depending on the morality of the majority or where did our morality to say this is right or wrong come from in the first place? Do we have the right morals in saying what is right even if it hurts someone else?
-
@jj4christ A right to life is a choice people make every day. If there was no way to die from another human being, then the choice would always be life. If the core right on this Earth for humans is life, do we take the right away to death? We would have to take the coexistence away. Fetus are not only considered property of the mother (as to nurture for or discard of) they are able to end up as property of Government who are also able to take or give that life a chance. So I ask this
-
@jj4christ There are cases out there where the baby can end up harming the mother or ending up hurting itself and dying in the womb to which we can not deny either, there will be pros and cons to a mother bearing a child.
-
@huskerfraz Every human has a fundamental right to life yet, why is it in many places across the world that right is taken away by Government and State? The death penalty for example as well as Government issued assassinations? I am simply pointing out that rights that humans have are taken away, chosen, given and expire every day to which human rights to life are a choice in this world. That is a sad truth that has happened through history of our race. I accept all truths between us
I don't disagree that a fetus is human; it is, indeed, neither a dog nor cat nor any other species.
The big point in my argument is: I like killing people. And I don't care for your whining. 8D
RyleyAshford 3 months ago 3
@FinerThingInLife1 There is a right answer to this issue. Most pro-choicers would not deny that killing another human is wrong, instead they seek to justify the cold expedience of abortion by redefining what is a human. They will throw many irrelevant issues on the table (women's rights, consciousness, religion, etc.) in order to detract from the fundamental fact: an unborn child, fetus, etc. is a human, all humans have a fundamental right to life, therefore, abortion is wrong
huskerfraz 2 weeks ago