Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

South Australia (Sea Shanty arr Stephen Leek) SATB choir

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,675
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 6, 2008

Brighton Concert Choir 2004
Michael Griffin
Adelaide, Australia
download mp3 at www.musiceducationworld.com

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • ........it's like they surgically removed the spirit of this song.......

  • I respect the technical aspects of this arrangement, but I believe it renders the song rather soulless, and not particularly interesting to listen to, even if the choir sings prettily.

see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I find it quite good of these folks to front up and give it their best. to step out of their everyday lives and do this. you see, it's not in the quality but rather it's in the "try". in spite of all the outcries of "surgical removal", "rather soulless", "killed", "Falala", "1 soprano", or what-have-you, these guys and gals just went ahead in the face of everything and did it. Hear, hear, Sean2Ireland, and I agree: "good job".

  • killed it.

  • Oh dear.Falalala

  • HEEEEVE not going to lie, the vowels are horribly bright. its like paint peeling bright. and I hear ONE first soprano. also why is this being directed so fast? the accompanist can't even keep up because they're going so fast.

  • This song was never meant for this sort of treatment. The choir is spectacularly good but sea shanties don't work here. They are not arranged choral numbers. True the drunk guys aren't any good either but a good group of shantymen is the best.

  • I like this version, it's different than having five drunken semi-Irishmen singing it, but completely pleasurable ... good job, very easy to listen to

  • Im curious what ppl would say the "point" of this kind of arrangement is. Im not being negative, merely inquisitive. I do like any creative new music (trained to be a composer myself), and think Charles Ives kind of stuff works when it uses trad. material. But this really relates nothing to the essence of the chantey-- so what is the point of doing this name-borrowing VERSUS just making up ones own melody/lyrics? Would audiences get the reference, to add some sense of nostalgia, or...?

  • omgomg love it!@

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more