Ravi Zacharias Q & A: The Bible's Reliability and Various Interpertations

Ravi Zacharias answers a question about the Bible's various interpretations.

The question was posed during a meeting at Waterloo University.

The audio was downloaded from www.rzim.org under the podcast Just Thinking.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Ravi
• Zacharias
• Bible
• Truth
• inerrancy
• infallible
• inspired
• various
• interpertations
• reliabile
• God
• Christ
• Christian
• Question
• Answer
• Waterloo
• University
• Students

[S13apark1]

@AHMEDBULAXUBEY

What's really dumb is when you say *budhi instead of Buddhist. Dude, Ravi is smarter than you. deal with it.

[Assultman1001]

Sometimes i wonder if people actually hear ravi or if they just put the volume down all they way down so they can say a bunch of stuff that ravi already awnserd inother videos.

[soulwake85]

@AHMEDBULAXUBEY Did I somehow miss where anything was mentioned about 4 Bibles...? She asked why there are so many different sects that interpret the same things differently, which he answered...

[AHMEDBULAXUBEY]

Ravi is dumb the lady that asked the question and Ravi his answer was every book is equal who asked him about the other book she asked the bible not the Quran or Budhi or Jew why he dont explain why the bible is 4 bibles

[quakerman7]

@gsschoenfeld If it makes you feel any better, I'm an Evangelical Quaker. In any case, because Quakerism is decentralized, you kinda get Protestantism-in-microcosm. Here is a haiku I wrote you might like: 'Mysticism sucks. Everytime i deign to speak, people think I'm nuts.' I like hard-nosed. It seems 90% of these postings is just blah blah 'I feel!' What it really comes down to is 1) OT prophecies and 2) Resurrection. Each can be historically investigated.

[gsschoenfeld]

@quakerman7 Thanks for the suggestion. I'm vaguely familiar with the history of Quakers, enough to recognize that is is significantly different than Protestantism and Catholicism. I'll follow your suggestion and take a deeper look, but I'll warn you that I can be a bit hard-nosed when it comes to verifiable facts. I may end up respectfully rejecting portions of Quakerism which seem a bit too mystical for me.

[quakerman7]

@gsschoenfeld Heh. Have you ever looked into Quakerism? The geneology first: Early Church > Roman Church > Catholicism > Protestantism > Church of England > Quakers (dissenting from CofE). When it comes to 'Sola Scriptura' you might find Quakerism a bit unique. We are mystics, even the most conservative of us. The connection to direct revalation/interpretation is much more closely tied to the Holy Spirit than the plain-text on the page. Translations? We read them all.

[lpwis]

A place to learn about early belief and practices NazareneIsrael-com many free videos and books and studies for you to enjoy.

[2792revs]

believer |biˈlēvər|

noun

1 a person who believes that a specified thing is effective, proper, or desirable : a believer in ghosts | a firm believer that party politics has no place in local government.

2 an adherent of a particular religion; someone with religious faith.

Thesaurus

[2792revs]

atheism |ˈāθēˌizəm|

noun

the theory or belief that God does not exist.

agnostic |agˈnästik|

noun

a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God.

believer |biˈlēvər|

noun