New Discovery in Stanley Kubrick's THE SHINING: THE SHONE REPORT
Uploader Comments (shawnfella)
Top Comments
-
@TheKillerklown3331 Thanks for the independent verification. I was hoping someone would do that.
Once you realize, fully grok, understand and believe that it is there.... and once you get the idea that it is strategically placed to underwrite several different layers of subtext simultaneously... THEN you begin to get an idea of the implications.
Kubrick didn't make films in the normal sense of the word. He made ENCODED DOCUMENTS.
Soon we will learn that all of his films share the same code.
-
@DarkAmbient93 its definitely in the film ... very faint but totally audible and noticeable .. but it could just be audible sounds being made in the hotel by someone moving something
is there validation that is actually kubricks voice? not sure ... waiting for the other shoe to drop and see more
All Comments (168)
-
did you make that shotlist/timeline? I would love to get a copy
-
@sosiopat I guess you are probably one of those people who finds it difficult to count as high as 19?
-
@shawnfella "It's my name. Shawn. Only it's not my name. It's that other word that sounds like my name Shone." You do realize that people are sort of "programmed" to notice their name, right? I hear my name everywhere when I'm sleep deprived, for instance. This was my first thought when I noticed your username, and I was surprised to see that you were aware of this connection and still believe these theories.
-
@acidjack73 Why would Kubrick be a nutter just because he has a few psychotic fans?
-
No personal offense meant, but the more I read about the hidden audio and symbolism in Kubrick's films, particularly this one, the more I'm convinced that both Kubrick and many of his fans were obsessed nutters.
-
Will you be posting a follow up video to this soon?....Please do!
-
Fascinating, thank you. Checked the Dvd's it's there perfectly audible. And i have to admit, a bit frightening in its implications..
-
hopefully those flashes arent in the real film
-
part of the music
This just doesn't work. The frame timings depend on which cut of the film you are viewing (144mins or 113mins). Furthermore, claiming several different meanings for their placement (looks to camera, frame timing, thematic subtext, etc) makes it implausible. You claim shone 3 has a temporal placement, but also matches Jack Nicholson's look into camera. If both are significant Kubrick would've had to edit the entire movie to match these audio cues rather than for dramatic pacing. Unlikely.
RENCHER 1 month ago
@RENCHER It may seem unlikely to you, but that is exactly what he did.
Kubrick edited his 144 minute cut to be the MASTER cut incorporating all of the deeply embedded subtext. The 113 minute cut is just a movie. The 144 minute version is cut to present the movie AND the coded labyrinthine subtext in numerically precise.patterns. There are places in the film where DOZENS of subtextual layers come together. These overlaps that you say are "implausible" are par for the course.
shawnfella 1 month ago
@RENCHER Furthermore, I didn't, as you say, "...claim several meanings for their placement."
I merely mapped the Shone Report occurrences and measured their temporal positions.
And then I made some observations as to what is occurring in the proximity of each Shone Report.
The only "claims" I made in this are of the accuracy of my measurements and the overall significance of the Shone Report as a doorway into Kubrick's labyrinth.
I 'm claiming there is much more to come.
So hang on.
shawnfella 1 month ago