There's lots of evidence for Jesus!

HOW A CHRISTIAN RESPONDS TO THIS VIDEO-

/watch?v=Gh6X4YBUMh0

LOL, notice how there was ZERO evidence cited? What you read in your video was the typical Christian talking points. It had nothing to do with substantiating claims. Xian scholars can't even do that.

"Apart from the New Testament writings and later writings dependent upon these, our sources of information about the life and teaching of Jesus are scanty and problematic"

- F.F. Bruce, A founder of the modern evangelical movement

- "Who Was Jesus? Fingerprints of The Christ" (WWJ) page 84

3 examples? Really? Thats enough to convince you? In a secular AP textbook they teach that Jesus not only existed but was betrayed by Judas and died on a cross.

Learn the difference between claims/talking points and actually substantiating those claims with credible evidence ... like this video does -

watch?v=xHoDpQaYXw4

Enjoy the book - watch?v=xfzolk7FRXk

After they put his mutilated body on the cross 2000 yrs ago they still have no remorse for what they did? Is this the God chosen people? Then Moses made a big mistake, he should stay for the rest of his life in Egypt.

This is proof that this country is in the wrong hands. Putting this video clip trash as a brainwash tool by either communists, deviated perverts, atheists and even Zionist Jews that hates Christianity and Jews that spit on every Christian symbol, even Muslims have more respect for Jesus than any Jew. Imagine who is behind of all this masquerade?

CartesianTheist, LOL, an interesting side note, It's funny how the bible mentions "LIBERAL" several times. I think you're just jealous.

The Jesus Forgery: Josephus Untangled
truthbeknown. com /josephus. htm

Pliny, Tacitus and Suetonius: No Proof of Jesus truthbeknown. com /pliny. htm

Yes the olf 'Truth be Known' website! I guess that's the safe-haven of all conspiracy theorists eh? But citing such a thing is not evidence in the SLIGHTEST.

You see you did not or, more likely, could not respond to my point which was that on writings such as Aristotle's we assume authenticity unless there is good reason not to - even with that lapse of time between autograph and copy.

New Testament:

Eariest copy: c.120 AD
Number of: Well over 5000 !!!!!!

LOL, it's transparent a glass that you can't counter those TBK articles so you respond with the typical xian apologist trash i.e. ad homs.

The Jesus Forgery: Josephus Untangled
truthbeknown. com /josephus. htm

Pliny, Tacitus and Suetonius: No Proof of Jesus
truthbeknown. com /pliny. htm

You could shut this entire debate down right now by sharing CREDIBLE evidence for your beloved biblical Jesus. You'd be the 1st to do so in all history too - you'd get a prize & be on the news!!!

The thing is I wouldn't get on TV since the entire field of history accepts Jesus as a historical person.

Rather, your non-specialists would be on TV if they could prove he was not real. Only problem is they can't. Not without destroying all the fundamental tenets by which history is done in the first place anyway. That's why genuine historians would not do it!

When a new theory comes along it must overthrow the old one to claim bragging rights. You're just bitter because that's not done!