There's lots of evidence for Jesus!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
40,654
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 7, 2008

Christian (and Jewish) scholars say - "No there isn't!"

Excerpt from the video "Who Was Jesus? Fingerprints of the Christ" by Acharya S.

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfzolk7FRXk

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CA5SHKM3V48

http://www.truthbeknown.com/

http://www.stellarhousepublishing.com/

  • likes, 104 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (spaceagebachelor)

  • I'm holding out for the long form birth certificate for Jesus. Only once I see that will I believe he is legally qualified to be the king of kings.

  • @GawdOfThunder Given that they went to Bethlehem for the census - I'm surprised the birth wasn't recorded at the time :)

Top Comments

  • Actually there are roman historians writing about Julius Ceasar. A lot of them actually.

see all

All Comments (1,632)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @looncraz Yeah I hate running out of room just when you're on a roll.

    I like your style, but I have to admit that when it comes to fecal flinging,I'm not counting on converting the other side.

    I'd prefer to think that those who read find something of value or the courage to stand up and demand a rational society.

    On the other hand, it could just be my rampant ego talking...

  • @moopism Yes, indeed, I ran out of characters :-(

    I prefer to bait people in arguments, slowly bashing their heads into their own misconceptions until they have no choice but to either realize the truth, or to merely file away the information for the day they realize the truth - should that day come.

    Peace!

  • @looncraz "Yes, Socrates is a good example. We can only assume he existed as we can only assume Jesus existed."

    Last I heard no one said Socrates walked on water or raised the dead, so in terms of it mattering, well, I guess there is a huge difference.

  • @hughesjd83 "The earliest writings on this is only 20 years after the event. "

    And what manuscript would that be, EXACTLY? Even the P52 papyrus fragment could only at its earliest estimate be 60 years after the fact.

    Please don't start making bullshit up. It's far too easy to do some research. But I guess when you're defending fairytales, all's fair,eh?

  • @SuperJamesbondjr "why arent the gospels good enough"

    Hmm, let's see...I know! Because they're riddled with fantastical claims of the supernatural and not written by any eyewitnesses nor written during the time of said events.

  • The Romans were quite an efficient lot. Nowhere in their census-taking history did they require families to go back to their hometowns to be counted. Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of a "current" census?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more