@alanbstard4 yes, you showed sources which give records sizes (and the 670lbs figure being within normal range is exaggerated). GIANT tigers have nothing to do with our conversation. I already established why it's stupid of you to even bring them up, yet you persist to attempt to present this information as if it's relevant. You accuse me of fanboyism, yet I'm the one who's presenting you with objective studies, and you refuse to even read the evidence presented. What's wrong with you?
@alanbstard4 liger? Really. You're going to try and bring ligers into this? You truly are a fool. Due to the genetic combination, Ligers lack the growth inhibitors of lions and tigers. They're enormous but also effectively useless as big cats. Unlike Kodiaks, who are genetically programmed to function effectively at such weights. They're also an unnatural species created under man made conditions and TOTALLY irrelevant to our conversation. Are you really so dumb?
@alanbstard4 also, there is a so called " Ligon " a cross between a tiger and Lion in captivity, that will weight 1250ibs when mature. He weights 1000 lbs now
i've got news for you. I also shoeed sources. Not my fault you can;t handle it
You are a bear fan boy, simple. I supplied sources and never once claimed a tiger will always beat a grizzly. I said you should not be too sure you are right
Check with the Smithsonian and the Guiness book of records, or are they ignorant too?
@alanbstard4 in light of that, I think I'll end this debate here. I've no desire to converse with someone who's so blatantly ignorant and would rather cling to antiquated and EXTREMELY atypical figures that reinforce his biased love of tigers as opposed to looking at the information objectively and actually reading the evidence presented to him. Goodbye.
Facing an armed prey head on, so badass.
janmac86 1 day ago
@joemanses No I thought it intersting.nothing more
alanbstard4 4 days ago
i saw those. What's your point?
alanbstard4 4 days ago
@alanbstard4 yes, you showed sources which give records sizes (and the 670lbs figure being within normal range is exaggerated). GIANT tigers have nothing to do with our conversation. I already established why it's stupid of you to even bring them up, yet you persist to attempt to present this information as if it's relevant. You accuse me of fanboyism, yet I'm the one who's presenting you with objective studies, and you refuse to even read the evidence presented. What's wrong with you?
joemanses 4 days ago
@alanbstard4 liger? Really. You're going to try and bring ligers into this? You truly are a fool. Due to the genetic combination, Ligers lack the growth inhibitors of lions and tigers. They're enormous but also effectively useless as big cats. Unlike Kodiaks, who are genetically programmed to function effectively at such weights. They're also an unnatural species created under man made conditions and TOTALLY irrelevant to our conversation. Are you really so dumb?
joemanses 4 days ago
@alanbstard4 also, there is a so called " Ligon " a cross between a tiger and Lion in captivity, that will weight 1250ibs when mature. He weights 1000 lbs now
google " Ligon "
alanbstard4 4 days ago
i've got news for you. I also shoeed sources. Not my fault you can;t handle it
You are a bear fan boy, simple. I supplied sources and never once claimed a tiger will always beat a grizzly. I said you should not be too sure you are right
Check with the Smithsonian and the Guiness book of records, or are they ignorant too?
alanbstard4 4 days ago
@alanbstard4 in light of that, I think I'll end this debate here. I've no desire to converse with someone who's so blatantly ignorant and would rather cling to antiquated and EXTREMELY atypical figures that reinforce his biased love of tigers as opposed to looking at the information objectively and actually reading the evidence presented to him. Goodbye.
joemanses 5 days ago