Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

3D Pentagon strike recreation

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
17,225
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 23, 2006

By comparing the size of the police car to the object and recreating the whole scene in 3D it is evident that the object is NOT a boeing 757 jetliner.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 20 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (twostaff)

  • fish eye lens makes things on the edge seem smaller.. u rendered in a regular camera lens

  • Yes, but that would also mean everything in the same area of the fish eye lense wills tillb e equal. IF the police car and the plane appear in the same part of the lense whether everything there is bigger or smaller the plane is still not much bigger than 4 police cars, a real 757 is the size of 20 police cars.

  • the rest of the plane is outside the frame idiot

  • I would accept that explanation, problem is, the pentagon says the whole plane is in the frame at that point. So I will ad you to the list of people who have questions about the Pentagon's official explanation : )

  • And finally the jet would be on radar (trasnponder on OR off) from takeoff till impact, there was no "switching" in the air and rerouting UA77 to be shot down or whatever the theory is. Face it, a UA 757 DID hit the pentagon.

  • Did you hear the official 9/11 commission report? They lost planes for hours! NORAD and the FAA couldnt track 757s and 767s. You are absolutely right NORAD should be able to track a 757 with transponer on or off or with no tranponder.

Top Comments

  • First this idiot points out the SMOKE trail as being the plane second how could he know that litte blob he pointed out was a police car. Give me a break.

  • but it doesn t explains why FBI didn t show another video, with much better frame rate ..

    we want to know about complete truth !

see all

All Comments (130)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I was at The Pentagon with DMORT cleaning up this horrible mess. There was indeed 757 wreckage at the site. A plane did in fact hit The Pentagon. It wasn't a magic missile, storm troopers, santa claus with C4, or Bill Cosby in a government UFO. It is what it is. My eyes didn't lie to me. I guess now someones going to say "they" put the wreckage there. Go ahead...makes you even more deluded.

  • Has anyone thought to find the guy driving the car? Seems to me he probably had an excellent view of whatever flew into the building

  • it was the russians

  • How stupid can people be?

    JFK talked about secrecy secret societies and conspiracy within government that he was going to do away with.

    Great reason for assasination

    Obama opened the government recinded Heir Bushs secret conspiracy gag order.

    Conspirators try to hide in the sewers along with the minds of the idiots ignorant of history.

    Simply crying about conspiracy theories is moronic.

  • well .. 4 planes where hijacked that day NO CONSPERESY THEORY!

  • More bullshit from the "truthers"

    Get lives morons.

  • you ever heard of depth. the police car in that video is closer to the camera then the plane therefore it would give the illusion that they were in fact the same height. which they are not

  • it is not honest

    plane 's trajectory is 45 degres from the front of pentagon .

    so the size doesn t looks like been the reality of the plane 's nose .

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more