oh and for ur information the official figures on the mps show its 0-60mph being 6.3 seconds.... but the preludes is 6.1.... dude... u know jack about cars.... as u have just proven...
u spanner.. it does not weigh more... the prelude weighs in at less than 1100kg.... the mazda 3 mps weighs 1485kg!!! and the bhp tonne figures are 175bhp/tonne for the mps, and 177bhp/tonne for the prelude... so actually get ur damn facts right before u call anyone a retard... because its not just power that effects performance... its gearing, drag co-efficience, and rolling resistance aswell as the effectiveness of the design of the powerband...mps lost to the prelude Vtec... period!
I beat a prelude the other day in my daewoo lanos 1.6. Retard lol, ur car not only makes less HP but weighs more... ur teacher must not know how to either change gears or use the accelerator. 0-100 in under 6 seconds is easy with the mazda 3, ur prelude is like what...19 seconds?
well i know it was an mps because i know the person who owns it he is a teacher at my college, and he was going for it... he asked me what the f***K it was that was under the bonnet of the lude...
A what pass?? Oh, a bypass!! I guess the driver of the MPS (if it really was an MPS) didn't have to prove anything or didn't have a clue. There is NO WAY a stock prelude would be quicker in a straight line. A stock 3MPS is quicker than a basic 911 from 80-120km/h. Throw in some tight corners in the prelude with a good driver on the other hand.... :-)
can i just say that i absolutly killed one of these down a bi-pass in my 1995 honda prelude with 183bhp, and yes it is standard..... it was soooooo slow... haha
oh and for ur information the official figures on the mps show its 0-60mph being 6.3 seconds.... but the preludes is 6.1.... dude... u know jack about cars.... as u have just proven...
steds15 2 years ago
u spanner.. it does not weigh more... the prelude weighs in at less than 1100kg.... the mazda 3 mps weighs 1485kg!!! and the bhp tonne figures are 175bhp/tonne for the mps, and 177bhp/tonne for the prelude... so actually get ur damn facts right before u call anyone a retard... because its not just power that effects performance... its gearing, drag co-efficience, and rolling resistance aswell as the effectiveness of the design of the powerband...mps lost to the prelude Vtec... period!
steds15 2 years ago
I beat a prelude the other day in my daewoo lanos 1.6. Retard lol, ur car not only makes less HP but weighs more... ur teacher must not know how to either change gears or use the accelerator. 0-100 in under 6 seconds is easy with the mazda 3, ur prelude is like what...19 seconds?
danwooson 2 years ago
well i know it was an mps because i know the person who owns it he is a teacher at my college, and he was going for it... he asked me what the f***K it was that was under the bonnet of the lude...
steds15 2 years ago
A what pass?? Oh, a bypass!! I guess the driver of the MPS (if it really was an MPS) didn't have to prove anything or didn't have a clue. There is NO WAY a stock prelude would be quicker in a straight line. A stock 3MPS is quicker than a basic 911 from 80-120km/h. Throw in some tight corners in the prelude with a good driver on the other hand.... :-)
mafiand 3 years ago
can i just say that i absolutly killed one of these down a bi-pass in my 1995 honda prelude with 183bhp, and yes it is standard..... it was soooooo slow... haha
steds15 3 years ago
the mps6 was so kick ass i do miss it
ilovenissan 3 years ago
I WANT ONE!!!!!
XXXdiffXXX 3 years ago