PROTOTYPE Military Aircraft X-37-2C Fighter test flight simulation
Uploader Comments (mountainLeader001)
All Comments (188)
-
@BiccusD Oh, and can you say F22 Raptor?!? lmao
-
@mountainLeader001 He has an airfoil directing the air right over the control surfaces dipshit. What grade are you in, kindergarten? Go take your nap lil boy.
-
@LegereBen don't know much about canards do you....
-
I happen to be the owner of a venture capital firm that would gladly invest 1.3 billion dollars in this project, who can I get in touch with?
-
I may be plain stupid, but I do not see, how turning in tighter circles at higher speeds (due to thrust vectoring) would lessen the G load on the pilot.
The G load comes from the acceleration as th plane switches direction at a speed. If the time spent to turn is less, then the G load should be higher...
-
Noob '' MAYA '' music -.-
-
this is no more stealthy than my grandmothers shopping cart.
-
get a grip on the eggs boys...this stuff here is SOO conventional. Ho hum. Airflow?
Hahahahah. I like the machines that don't worry about airflow. Know what I mean? Even nuclear engines were in OUR craft out in the Nellis/Tonopah desert. We been the conventional route. You young folks born after 1980 just may find yourselves doing business elsewhere...and I don't mean China either, if you get my drift. We are there. Demand nothing less! Gravity Drive is your present and future!!!!
-
@davetonia1233 The elevators may move just fine, but the airflow over the surface will lose it's effect with increased airspeed. There is a reason that modern aircraft that fly above mach 1 have one piece elevators. I'm just stating facts. Even with canards it will still be an unstable platform with excessive surface area and drag. It would make a great low speed fighter though.
Your elevators will not work above Mach 1 due to the turbulence over the flight surfaces..... You should take some fluid dynamics courses and maybe put a little thought into how things work.
LegereBen 1 year ago 3
@LegereBen
well i thought i had some aero dynamics courses in my eduqation but i might be wrong since your are clearlly the expert here! one thing.. think about the concorde Why jump into conclusions if you dont know the methode of control and the level of participation of the tail, flaperons, and canards. There is absolutely no problem with this type of airfoil in this configuration with the combined flaperon, tail and canards configuration to work properly above mach 1.
mountainLeader001 1 year ago 3