Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

PROTOTYPE Military Aircraft X-37-2C Fighter test flight simulation

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
208,223
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 3, 2007

Stealth Interdiction Fighter. This thing has been designed in secret in 1998 by TANCOLOGY and recently developed by SCOOBY. It has unimagenable human machine interface. This fighter is not just an aircraft. It is also a diverse weapon platform and a command & control, communications C&C or even better a C^3 centre. It is capable of managing a battlefield or operation theatre. It communicates without putting any extra loads on the pilot with special combat UAV's and depending on the pilots decision the aircraft commands the uav's for actions om specific targets. Making it possible for the pilot to keep his situational awareness at most. In addition this beautifull aircraft has superior performance and agility

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (mountainLeader001)

  • Your elevators will not work above Mach 1 due to the turbulence over the flight surfaces..... You should take some fluid dynamics courses and maybe put a little thought into how things work.

  • @LegereBen

    well i thought i had some aero dynamics courses in my eduqation but i might be wrong since your are clearlly the expert here! one thing.. think about the concorde Why jump into conclusions if you dont know the methode of control and the level of participation of the tail, flaperons, and canards. There is absolutely no problem with this type of airfoil in this configuration with the combined flaperon, tail and canards configuration to work properly above mach 1.

see all

All Comments (188)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @BiccusD Oh, and can you say F22 Raptor?!? lmao

  • @mountainLeader001 He has an airfoil directing the air right over the control surfaces dipshit. What grade are you in, kindergarten? Go take your nap lil boy.

    

  • @LegereBen don't know much about canards do you....

  • I happen to be the owner of a venture capital firm that would gladly invest 1.3 billion dollars in this project, who can I get in touch with?

  • I may be plain stupid, but I do not see, how turning in tighter circles at higher speeds (due to thrust vectoring) would lessen the G load on the pilot.

    The G load comes from the acceleration as th plane switches direction at a speed. If the time spent to turn is less, then the G load should be higher...

  • Noob '' MAYA '' music -.-

  • this is no more stealthy than my grandmothers shopping cart.

  • get a grip on the eggs boys...this stuff here is SOO conventional. Ho hum. Airflow?

    Hahahahah. I like the machines that don't worry about airflow. Know what I mean? Even nuclear engines were in OUR craft out in the Nellis/Tonopah desert. We been the conventional route. You young folks born after 1980 just may find yourselves doing business elsewhere...and I don't mean China either, if you get my drift. We are there. Demand nothing less! Gravity Drive is your present and future!!!!

  • @davetonia1233 The elevators may move just fine, but the airflow over the surface will lose it's effect with increased airspeed. There is a reason that modern aircraft that fly above mach 1 have one piece elevators. I'm just stating facts. Even with canards it will still be an unstable platform with excessive surface area and drag. It would make a great low speed fighter though.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more