Liberty Forum 2009 Marc Stevens 4

Paraphrasing Marc Stevens, in this speech he rips your reality from you. He discusses how he defends himself and his clients against government thugs by attacking them through their legal system. If You've never seen one of Marc's videos then it is highly recommended. He will open you eyes to the delusions that we are all a part of.

http://marcstevens.net/

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• nh
• liberty
• forum
• free
• state
• project
• ron
• pual
• mary
• ruwart
• gult
• libertarian
• statist
• democrat
• republican
• president
• sicko
• obama
• barack
• illegal
• alien
• men
• man
• women
• child
• mother
• father
• parent
• grandfather
• kentucky
• liberal
• conservative
• family
• guy
• simpsons
• simpson
• south
• park
• angry
• video
• game
• nerd
• avgn
• cinemassacre
• machinima
• halo
• xbox
• playstation
• wii
• nintendo
• sony
• microsoft
• united
• states
• government
• washington
• DC
• anarchy
• voluntary
• violence
• forgiveness
• neighbors
• choices
• choice
• respect
• fascist

[signofthehammer]

I think he is right about the masons and all that. Yes they exist and the Presidents are part of these societies but it doesn't really matter because you are not going to get them with that. While people lose their minds with this Illuminati stuff, they're still acting on our persons without any logical explanation, without us knowing.

[freestatereport]

you got that right.

[AceOfHeart2012]

I agree with the nonsense of the 'honorable' thing. Like with cops. I don't see a police officer. I see a man with a gun who will kill you if you piss him off enough. End of story. It matters not to me if he's wearing a uniform and a badge, he's still just a man with a gun who will kill you if you piss him off.

[black9897]

I agree using paper as money seems a bit silly, and I may not fully understand it, but it works and you have to use something as currency. 

[libertarianjury]

The honorable joe sixpack! Right on!!! ...The honorable Carl .50 cal!

[libertarianjury]

"A right is a legal claim". Not exactly, a right is an idea. ...It represents a moral claim.

The Rand institute is exactly correct about natural rights. Lysander Spooner was also correct. "Moral rights" are logical constructs. (They are not gauranteed nor codified by the Constitution, but that's what they are.)

[OneManAndHisFiction]

You establish your rights at law (common law) through a "Claim of Right".

See examples like "Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right" to establish your rights standing sovereign as one of the People.