Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Carl Sagan's Cosmos Episode 2 part2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
62,793
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 7, 2007

continued from part1

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • anyone else think his voice is epic as fuck?

  • In the long run, it's really a silly debate. Whether or not a God exists has no real bearing on whether or not the laws of nature exist. A truly omnipotent being could have just as easily had a goal in mind and then created a system of "laws" that would eventually get there as it could just do it all with a snap of the fingers (where's the fun in that...). Personally, I think we spend too much time bickering over the physics engine and not enough time actually playing the game...

see all

All Comments (200)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @possumverde

    Ah, but the bickering is part of the game for some. Some people are argumentative, and derive immense pleasure out of the bickering. Yes, in some cases it is incredibly annoying, but in other cases, the bickering leads to a conclusion that allows the game to progress in a way it couldn't before.

    Everyone is valuable at some point. Even the ugliest of dogs have their day....

  • @BlackHawkEU i thank you need to burn one,with charles darwin,

  • trilobites were around 300 million years,i bet there god looked just like them,

  • @BlackHawkEU P.S. Just google talk origins transitional and also watch?v=Qfoje7jVJpU. Please remember that speciation is when one group can no longer chemically breed with the parent group. See domestic dogs and the African wolf. (Sorry, youtube doesn't like it when I put in web sites.)

  • @BlackHawkEU In science, a theory is never proved, it can only be disproved or supported. Theories never become fact. A theory is the highest level of confidence science can assign to an explanation of facts. Would you say the same of gravity theory, germ theory, economic theory, string theory, theory of relativity, etc?

  • He is a good man.

  • @Ahdanack I think it is still no prove of the theory, so it stays a theory, watch?v=lJNgTUhTJvg&feature=re­lated

    This video deals with other theories that are a bit different, I am not saying that are true. But are just as valid and unsubstantiated as the evolution theory.

  • @BlackHawkEU Hey bro, sorry to butt in on this conversation, but check this out. It's pretty much the proof you just asked for.

    wikipedia(dot)org/wiki/Ring_sp­­ecies

    wikipedia(dot)org/wiki/Ensatin­a

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more