McDarby & Cona v. Merck
Loading...
Loading...
10:00
Mark Lanier- Tort "War Stories"- Part 3by PLMSTube5,266 views- 9:47
Mark Lanier- Tort "War Stories"- Part 2by PLMSTube5,411 views
- 9:33
Mark Lanier- Tort "War Stories"- Part 4by PLMSTube4,761 views
- 8:49
Mark Lanier- Tort "War Stories"- Part 6by PLMSTube3,733 views
- 5:11
Voire Direby TexanEagle214,859 views
- 4:34
Mock Trial 2011 Opening Statementby MissAlyyyy10,213 views
- 9:47
Mark Lanier- Tort "War Stories"- Part 5by PLMSTube4,189 views
- 4:37
Gerry Spence - Closing Argument - New York Regional Seminar 2006by TrialLawyersCollege15,420 views
- 5:28
Gerry Spence - Part 1 - 2010 Trial Lawyers College Advanced Courseby TrialLawyersCollege13,398 views
- 3:50
$1.6 Mill Trial Verdict with Punitives - Closing Argument - Dennis Wilenchikby trialverdict1,327 views
- 3:02
How to Win a Mock Trial Competitionby BeforeClass47,919 views
- 2:59
Murder trial defense openingby chroniclet23,973 views
- 5:31
Chroniclet.com Miller Trial - Defense Openingby chroniclet11,892 views
- 9:59
Opening/Closing Examples 1 of 4by TheBTAvideos8,486 views
- 9:59
Opening/Closing Examples 2 of 4by TheBTAvideos2,519 views
- 2:18
A Lawyer Walks into a Bar Trailerby dodonpachisupersport18,614 views
- 4:20
Liberty Media v. IAC Interactive Corp 03/14/2008by CourtroomView830 views
- 7:06
Dr. Lou Roz at Mark Lanier's X Mas party 2009by DocRozRox2,309 views
- 2:22
Jude Basile Law - Gerry Spenceby judebasilelaw2,208 views
- 6:23
Famous Speeches: To Kill a Mockingbirdby hiddenhobbit498,095 views
The unpopular truth is that in jury trials (especially civil claims)......cases rarely turn on what is legally relevant. Cases come down to emotion.......almost every time. It is the advocates place to provide a legal pretext or precedent for the jury to use in it's deliberation, however. But the scale needed to satisfy burden of proof in a civil claim is VERY differnt from criminal cases.
silas9735 8 months ago
He did not make up the 51% standard - so don't knock him for having to meet a standard that is set in place for him. that's just illogical.
beachrunner2011 1 year ago
Anyone who has to argue 51% standard of proof seems just as desperate as the desperate executives he mocks. Emotional appeals are not evidence. Effective for the jury? Probably. Effective in the eyes of the reviewing appeals court? Not likely. His big win in the fire Vioxx trial in Texas was reduced by about 90% by the trial court and then later reversed entirely on appeal because there was insufficient evidence to establish causation.
jasonbarnes0 1 year ago
Mark Lanier = Merck's worst nightmare
Merck stole Lanier's "CSI" closing argument from the Texas case, then Lanier skillfully throws it in their face
jbage007 1 year ago
the defense atty uses csi analogy this guy destroys it and then resurrects it to Slam the defense - I bet thats one sorry defense team - "desperate executives"lmfao
QAWwaqX 2 years ago
omg
QAWwaqX 2 years ago