Jean Pierre's Interview with Bob Brier
Uploader Comments (Khufufan)
Top Comments
-
Sounds good to me.
What is bazaar is finding an architect who knows how a building is built!
The ones I know are still determining the size and location of the building while the Structural Foundation Drawings are going out the door for bids!!
Video Responses
All Comments (48)
-
built by et's...humans are too dumb...they didnt even have a wheel then but they could build the great pyramid...next you'll tell me we sent men to the moon...
-
@ilovemixednuts Giving your other alias a compliment I suspect. You are your own biggest fan.
-
@isisankh It's fascinating in it's vapidness. . Briar is just an academic. They are useless "thinkers' like the people who spent their lives arguing about how many angels cold fit on the head of a pin. The obvious things seem to always elude them. If Houdin is going to propose using counterweights then there is no need for a 7% slope., or an internal ramp. They could be brought straight up the side of the pyramid with counterweights
-
@Indygoguy i like the name. Khufufan. thats awesome
-
@GUILDGOB Yes, indeed, a small ramp the width of a person would not do. A ramp could be nothing more than a human passageway for maintenance purposes.
-
@isisankh He's a horrible lisping fool!
-
Houdin is a typical product of a European socialist education. He spouts nonsense and can not see the forest for the trees. It makes absolutely NO sense for the builders to drag the large granite slabs for the King's chamber roof up to the height of the King's chamber by way of the ramp and counterweight. Why do all that when one could just have them at the Pyramid during the start of construction and then just raise them up with each level. He's a typical academic moron.
-
@Khufufan What if there is a ramp but it is too small to get most of the stones through? What if exists only as a human passageway? In order for the theory to be right a ramp, if it is ever found, needs to be large enough for the purpose of construction.
-
@spacemanjupiter Egyptology has NOTHING to do with science! A scientist would have TESTED their theories and then discarded them when they didn't hold up. Egyptologists have never tested nor demonstrated any part of their theories of how the pyramids were built. In fact, all the evidence points to the fact that their theories are wrong, yet they still teach the, This is not science, this is occultism, religion, superstition.
-
@isisankh its jean pierre houdin's theory
I just think its funny that in the year 2008, modern science still can't determine how these ancient, archaic structures were built. And even this guy with his new theory, he still can't prove it. No one can. Maybe if they could get the egyptian government to open up the left paw of the sphynx, we'd learn something about it.
spacemanjupiter 3 years ago
Yes but it's the only theory that can be proven very easily using non destructive infrared technology to detect the internal ramp. If the internal ramp exists, the theory is right.
Khufufan 3 years ago 3