President Obama's Top Scientist an Inconvenient Truth For Senate Democrats on Global Cooling

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
35,696
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 2, 2011

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • IPCC authors have ADMITTED AGW has little to do with science and more to do with redistribution of wealth.

  • @zasabiibasaz No, !! CO2 is a friendly gas. .It is essential to photosynthesis, plants thrive on it.

see all

All Comments (80)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @FreedomClause There are whacky "Warmists" and there are legitimated scientifically backed experts -- you shouldn't lump everyone in one category.

    And quit with your meretricious humbug "predictions."

  • @ninuxy the next 25 years will tell...so far, the predictions of the warmists are incorrect... seems the PDO is now starting from a much colder mean temp, and will cool enough this year alone to result in a global dip of 0.2C...the atlantic conveyor is shutting down, allowing arctic weather patterns to disperse further south.. and the sun spot activity for cycle 24 is much lower than expected.. the last time it was this low; solar cycle 5, 1797 during a mini ice age... many will starve to death

  • @chagnonp7 Cocksucker, in a closed ecosystem such as earth, the planet breaths in then breaths out. There is a balance between the amount of Oxygen and CO2 that the earth produces and consumes. By artificially increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, you will distort this balance.

    If you have a few plants in your garage, you and the plants breath in/out O/CO2 in reverse, but the balance is preserve. By turning on your car, you will eventually kill yourself and the plants. You get it now?

  • So this moron once again shoots himself in the foot.

    It was a very small percentage of scientists who had reached the global "cooling" conclusion and it was not, by any statistical measure, a consensus of the scientific community.

    I can cherry pick a few articles from any era to advance my uneducated agenda. You senator Inhofe must resign for such low buffoonery immediately. You are a disgrace to your state.

  • If 40 years ago there was indications of the earth cooling (Possibly) but today the average temp has risen and the ice caps have shrunk. shouldn't this make me even more worried about the effects of golbal warming?

  • youtube.com/watch?v=QPTo6mUoSC­0&feature=feedu

  • @crabber338

    Been there, read it.

    .

    OTTMAR EDENHOFER, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III,

    lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report SAID IT !

    .

    Chairman of the Copenhagen Climate Council, Tim Flannery ADMITTED his pagan gaia earth worship!

    .

    .So please, posting your opinions do not make the "science" any more fact than the bogus "science" itself does.

  • @classic7890 And I suppose you have a background in Climate or Meteorology and understand what the 'admission' referred to? You can take anything out of context and infer a different meaning.

    I can take your post and say Classic7890 wrote: "IPCC authors have admitted AGW..." and the meanings is totally different.

    You don't have to be a scientist to understand these things, but you can't just take things at face-value. You need to read a little and learn the challenges of finding trends.

    Am

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more