Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Most Common Law School Exam Mistake

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
30,755
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 29, 2008

Thomas Jefferson School of Law Professor David Steinberg talks about the most common mistake law students make on exams

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ThomasJeffersonLaw)

  • Thomas Jefferson has a world-class faculty and we have many Superior Court Judges among our graduates, as well as the District Attorney, Public Defender, and many top attorneys.

Top Comments

  • This video series is very helpful and insightful. Thank you very much, sir!

  • @redskins2k I think the people who do well are generally those who are good at writing. Anyone who can organize an essay quickly and clearly can do very well, even with large gaps in their knowledge of the material. Students with poor writing skills, even those who have a perfect understanding of the material, can find themselves failing classes simply because they couldn't articulate their understanding on exams. You have to conclude writing ability must be a vital part of being a lawyer.

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • He would make a great muppet voice actor. XD

  • This opened my eyes!

    I had a 10/20 on my first exam of my first year and I'm currently studying for my next exam but I'm afraid to do, what the professor calls, a "brain-dump".

    Thanks, again!

  • I was interested in this because someday I want to be able to become a lawyer.

    I'm only 16 right now, but I'd like to know something before hand o.o..

  • @ThomasJeffersonLaw

    I don't if anyone had stated this,

    but David Steinberg has a slight similarity to the Austrian Economist Friedrich Hayek.

  • This is awesome and really thought provoking! I really need to be more picky with my content and how relevant it is in my answer. Thanks from the UK!

  • @ThomasJeffersonLaw : Thanks from Australia ... LEC University of Sydney

  • @wind0wninja it is their code,however one can step into and out of sovereignty and into the commercial realm anytime,so its a good idea to sign this way so as to safeguard any sneaky attempts in tomfoolery by the PTB. Cheers.

  • @justaman6972 UCC is their code; as in theirs, meaning proprietary. Signing is merely the memorialization if the agreement meaning you already agreed to the terms & conditions. Anything else is contempt. Your first appearance in court is not your first court appearance. It's your first appeal. UCC stuff may work fine corp to corp but not against the state. Not when you're a citizen in collusion with it. If you really reserved your rights there would be no offer presented to sign; ab initio.

  • @wind0wninja good to see you're still at it man. msg me ,I have some info for you,very useful.Peace...Jurisdiction is granted usually by trickery,the defendant has no idea what happend,hence the reason I sign everything with ALL RIGHTS RESERVED W/O Prejudice UCC 1-207 and say as much when in court,that I am challenging the JD of the court,then they have to prove they have it,and if I didn't grant it they cant have gotten it. Not w/o my consent. Anyway peace.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more