The problem with the number "8" may be that the loop on the bottom should possibly be much larger. cutting through intersections 2, 6, the one to the top left of 2, and the one top right of 6 [ both I cannot read, sorry ] this would bring the loop above # 1 above the very top of all the intersections. But it may possibly throw off the measurements of the intersections. But that may be o.k. and should end up with 12? the symetry is where I saw it.
The problem with the number "8" may be that the loop on the bottom should possibly be much larger. cutting through intersections 2, 6, the one to the top left of 2, and the one top right of 6 [ both I cannot read, sorry ] this would bring the loop above # 1 above the very top of all the intersections. But it may possibly throw off the measurements of the intersections. But that may be o.k. and should end up with 12? the symetry is where I saw it.
broodyart 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
he wishes to tie his penis in a knot, poor lad.
AmericanDiaz 2 years ago
Spiffy!
Nice work, but just wondering, are you attempting to "discover" any one thing in particular?
zakkmiester 3 years ago