WeAreChange Interviews 1st Responder Greg Quibell
Top Comments
All Comments (51)
-
This brave man is my 2nd cousin, my dads first cousin. I was to young to remember him but I'm told by my parents that I used to play the drums down in his basement. I was in 2nd grade on 9/11. I'm a senior in high school now and I now regret not being able to say thank you or even goodbye. I wish I could remember him.
-
PoetryHound - You're just repeating a tired and familiar cop-out. People who use this argument do so because they were never taught to think critically. Your kind of sheep is fox news wet dream. Good luck ignoring reality.
-
deskducker, I respectfully disagree. The legitimacy of the data, and whether it is in fact "actual data," is determined by its source. I have seen too many distortions and misinterpretations to just accept someone's information as being true just because they say so or Joe Blow's web site says so.
-
People like you only attack the messenger and attempt to discredit the "source" of information instead of dealing with the acutal data on information that is brought forward. It is really getting tiresome that so many people can't deal with whether or not something is factual. I don't have an opinion on 911, I haven't done enough research. However, if people do bring info to light, the "info" should be the source of discourse, not who/what brought it forward.
-
I meant to say "profile", instead of "page".
-
"Says who?"
Says no one. It is a fact that the WTC complex was a crime scene. It is a fact that the debris was taken away and placed in a landfill and the rest of it was shipped off and used to build a ship. It was illegally removed.
I read your page. I know that you are just "messing with me". You know better. You know the facts.
-
"Yeah, because you say so, right?"
No, because the documented evidence says so.
"It has to be taken seriously by respected researchers in the media or universities or someplace legit."
Something does not become a fact because it is "taken seriously".
"Otherwise, it's the same thing as claims about being abducted by aliens. That's why."
No, actually, it's not because everything that I stated is a fact. Apparently, you have no idea what a fact is.
-
"No, I claimed it is documented because it is documented fact."
Yeah, because you say so, right? And then it turns out that your "sources" are all crappy conspiracy sites.
"Why does something have to be "taken seriously" by the media before it is a fact?"
It has to be taken seriously by respected researchers in the media or universities or someplace legit. Otherwise, it's the same thing as claims about being abducted by aliens. That's why.
"The debris was illegally removed"
Says who?
-
"the only place anything you've claimed is "documented""
No, I claimed it is documented because it is documented fact.
"No legit media/researchers take it seriously."
Why does something have to be "taken seriously" by the media before it is a fact? That is not the definition of a fact.
"your dumb WTC 7 claims to your unsubstantiated claims about "illegal" removal of debris"
It is not "dumb" or a "claim" The debris was illegally removed because it was a crime scene.
-
Pretty much the only people who swallow the 9/11 conspiracy silliness are those who have already programmed themselves to buy into all sorts of dumb conspiracies. It's no longer a coincidence that so many of them buy into Holocaust conspiracy, the London Underground bombing conspiracy, belief in some powerful yet vague New World Order, etc. etc. It's a paranoid and naive mindset that makes it impossible for them to differentiate real conspiracies from phony ones.
this is a fucking sin. i can't believe our government.
dubaiedge 4 years ago 11
I WANT THE TRUTH!
blood for blood motherfuckers, give me the truth or prepare for civil war.
diogeneslaertius666 4 years ago 9