DEFCON Warning System - Update 1/1/12

A digest and analysis of news and events regarding current threat of nuclear war against the United States as of January 1, 2012

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• political
• military
• analysis
• nuclear
• war
• attack
• news
• united
• states
• america
• china
• iran
• russia
• israel
• north
• korea
• commercial
• commentary

[rosiebgocats1]

I've a feeling it may not be Defcon 5 Condition Green for much longer.......

[DefconWarningSystem]

@centurion180ad

1) The shipment you referred to in your own message did not contain nuclear bunker busters.

2) Even if nuclear bunker busters were being shipped to the Iranian area, that does not equate to a first strike.  You have been told this time and time again. If you choose not to believe that, well, you're free not to.

[centurion180ad]

@DefconWarningSystem NO.

The weapons I am refering to are the NEW cagagory of nuclear weapons that are used to penetrate the surface to take out underground command centers.

Those are TACNUKE.

Moving nuclear weapons into a theater is a clear cut signal of intent.

If you don't understand that, you don't understant military situations.

[DefconWarningSystem]

@centurion180ad The bunker busters you are referring to are conventional, not NUCLEAR weapons.

Your assertion that "IF corporation united states wasn't planing to nuke Iran, those weapons would have never left CONUS" is without merit. Because the US is deploying bunker busters does not equate that the US is planning to nuke Iran. You might as well say "Because it's Tuesday, the US is planning to nuke Iran."

Your racism is affecting your thinking.

[centurion180ad]

@DefconWarningSystem Bunker buster TACNUKE weapons have been moved all the way forward to magazines in the Indian Ocean, pending their deployment on Iran.

IF corporation united states wasn't planing to nuke Iran, those weapons would have never left CONUS.

Iran is already under attack by corporation UNITED STATES.

I don't give a rat's ass what the Hell Is Ra El wants. Screw them.

[DefconWarningSystem]

@centurion180ad Any weapon can be part of a first-strike package. Therefore your assertion that the existence of bunker busters equals the intention to proceed with a first-strike is nonsense.

Yes, Iran considers itself already under attack. So does Israel. What is your point?

[DefconWarningSystem]

@centurion180ad Any weapon can be part of a first-strike package. Therefore your assertion that the existence of bunker busters equals the intention to proceed with a first-strike is nonsense.

Yes, Iran considers itself already under attack. So does Israel. What is your point?

[centurion180ad]

@DefconWarningSystem Bunker busters or any other TACNUKE can be first strike weapons, when the targeted country as no nuclear capability itself, and its IADS is too weak to stop bomber overflight, which is where IRan is at.

Present circumstance is that IRan is under seige, embargo, and unconventional assault. She is *already* being attacked.

Iran does not want the Debt Syndicate inbreeds to force them into cental banking slavery, and the pervert inbreeds are going to destroy them.

[DefconWarningSystem]

@centurion180ad Nuclear bunker busters are in the US arsenal, but I challenge your assertion that they are "all over the news networks". Bunker busters are also not first strike weapons as they are too heavy and need slower modes of transportation. Your nuclear "first strike" weapons are your tactical missiles, generally sub-launched or, in Iran's case, ship launched...if indeed the US was going to nuke Iran first.

Which isn't going to happen...not under current circumstances.

[centurion180ad]

@DefconWarningSystem There is EVERY indication that corporation united states is moving into position for a nuclear first strike.

Tactical Nuclear ground penetration "bunker busters" are all over news networks, having been stockpiled in the Indian Ocean begining almost a year ago.

Bunker busters are not a deterrent to preserve a conventional theater, those are first strike TACNUKE capability.

Don't put on a condom, if you aren't going to shag.

[DefconWarningSystem]

@centurion180ad Your racism is clouding you. We never said the US is incapable of a nuclear first strike. At this time, there is no indication that the US is positioning itself for one. If this changes, we will report it.