Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

A Serious Look At Creationism (Genesis 1:1, 2 & 3) Part 2/2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
142 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Colthrone)

  • EXCELLENT - NEW INFO !! THANKS!! THE MORE NEG RESPONSES U R GETTING I THINK only serves to prove your point. Am going to do some study on this-- i always wondered about all those cities in Genesis and couldnt fig it out. Thanks again for the work you did putting this together! Good foundation for a nice documentary-

  • @cieluore Thank you for the kind words. Yeah, a documentary would be nice (if i had the time, money and resources!) ANyway, glad you're going to look into this. That's basically the point of this video, to have people look into it. There's a treasure of information in Genesis.

  • And for the Arctic Dinosaurs, and " look to the bible for answers" That is pure nonsense.

    During the Late Cretaceous the Earth was on average a lot warmer than it is now. Plants such conifers, ginkgoes, ferns, cycads, bryophytes, horsetails and a few flowering plants demonstrate this. Not your book of myths. There is no gap or hole here. The only hole is in your education.

  • @GregQzag That's exactly what i say in the video, that the earth was a lot warmer than it is now. See? No need to argue.

see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thank you, thank you so much for sharing your knowledge (and your time) on this!

  • WOW.. Just wow. I had been wondering a lot about the book of Genesis when I started reading it a few months back and just couldn't fit the pieces together, was even getting a little frustrated about it..now it all makes sense!

  • I told R Sauzek about it; hope they watch it.. GOD BLESS YOU. If you're ever in Atlanta look us up

  • Excellent info

    You should consider creating a full documentary on this. Very insightful! THX!

  • 1:35 " If you answered Hebrew you are....."

    Utterly wrong. It would have been Aramaic.

    It is generally believed that in the 1st century CE, Jews in Judaea primarily spoke Aramaic -wiki

    Again, utterly wrong. I need to do some more nonsense on that 2 letter crud. But it appears elsewhere in the old testament in places no twisting can ever make it seem a reference to Jebus.

  • In your book of Myths John of Patmos, wrote in Greek, one of the strongest reasons he probability wasn't John, brother of James. Now your translation crap falls apart. If I say to you in Greek, I am Alpha and Omega, and you translate that to English, would you would translate it word for word, not "I am A and Z."

    Now onto the pure fantasy of your tale. Satan, slammed into earth? How do you you jump from Cast into the Pitt to slammed into the earth?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more