Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

acts are not laws~questioning the police

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
35,732
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 22, 2009

a friend of mine was stopped and searched by the police he did not concent to a search so they unlawfully detained him and took him to the police station for a search nothing was found as he is not a criminal and he was released without charge so he filed a complaint in regards to why he was detained. as he never got a reply about his complaint he took his camera to the police station to speak to the officer and ask what lawful authority (ACT) they detained him under.

  • likes, 19 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (300)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • he can not refuse to take your complaint - please come the board you might have a case against this officer

    complaintsaboutpolice.co.uk

    Come on a discussion board and help educate people

  • The bird who came through the receiption was highly shaggable, is tellong her that an offence?

  • Why is it even a debate - "I WANT TO FILE A COMPLAINT YOU TWIT! THAT'S ALL!" Other than telling me the procedure....FUCK OFF!

  • this country used to be full of work houses with children in them...that was legal.....men never used to be able to be convicted of raping their wife that was the law...it used to be legal to keep slaves ffs. If it was legal to have sex with children on a wednesday night after 8pm all these cunts championing the law would be there with their dicks out saying they were doing nothing wrong. well here's what I know.. a change is gonna come and all these evil sheeple will be dealt with accordingly

  • acts AND laws are for sheeple. good ppl know what's right and wrong, and know how to behave. laws and acts were created so they could justify doing things that are wrong.

    Think back to the iraq invasion... all the hype...... was it legal was it illegal.....going somewhere killing innocent women and children is wrong. but they create a smoke screen and justify it by saying it was legal. they tried to replace right and wrong with illegal and legal, so they can change what IS right and wrong

  • There is a difference between act and law. Acts are generally limited with specific language. Such as in California, State of, the vehicle act, section 21052 restricts the act to a specific group of persons. By knowing the statutes of the acts and finding how and who they apply to eliminates the question if fraud.

  • I love that these idiots accuse police of Fraud by enforcing law set out by statute acts. That's funny last time I checked Fraud was part of the Theft Act, so according to the hypocrites the police aren't breaking the law

  • it all stems from

    Modern "Commercial Law" Is based on Ancient Babylonian Codes

  • @msadler100 such a weightless argument. Common law and case law dictate that acts are laws, therefore they are laws. There is no counter to that argument.

  • @msadler100 It may have been passed while there was such a thing as Parliament, but Parliament did not have power to create law until the overthrow of Charles the first. This law was created by the monarch, therefore it is common law.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more