Dawkins Stumped?!? Let me answer!

This video is in response to now infamous video of Richard Dawkins pausing during an interview.
Here is Dawkin's reply to the video
http://www.skeptics.com.au/articles/dawkins.htm

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• JJjayco
• AndreaZ64
• isaharun
• Dawkins
• creationism
• evolution
• genetics
• creation
• ministries
• genome
• mutation

[FourDeuce01]

@ufewl

"I dropped biology pretty early"

That's obvious.

[ufewl]

@MARKLOSTP AND I definitely do not think the more info the better as I know the thing with the most 'information' is a plant!!!

You see the problem for Dawkins here is he could not give an answer when adding information or a mutation produced a better lifeform!!

All unintelligently designed mutations produce an inferior creature!!

[ufewl]

@MARKLOSTP furthermore he was asked to give an example and he could it!! I did not expect to hear autism because that is not always the case, and I can prove it so the guy.

Autism just happens in this specific case.

The main point is that any adding or 'information' to the genome screws it up (outside of normal reproduction where no new human genetic info is added).

Dawkins did not want to answer because all mutations produce an inferior being and thus disprove evolution.

[ufewl]

@MARKLOSTP I dropped biology pretty early I very much doubt it was covered in what I was taught, 100% sure. Now firstly Dawkin's is supposed to be an expert in this subject but he could not answer!! I don't need to read a text book to answer anway because it depends what you mean by information. For example I could add some information to this sentence now and I will imediately, fejrferjf;ergvo;gu54u290gu245u­g. Hope you get the idea and hoe it answers the question you could not answer yourself!!

[MARKLOSTP]

@ufewl Did you even know what the question means? Increase in the information of the genome. what kind of answer would you expect to hear? i bet not autism, youd prolly think the more info the better. The idea of information inside a genome does not simply define evolution... despite Dawkins not answering that question, is it really out of the realm of possibility for you yourself not to find out that answer?? its in a first year biology text book for crying out loud. dont be afraid to learn

[ufewl]

How come Dawkins as a geneticists could not give that answer?

[faithhopelove1987]

@patriotsundergod ignore @Fourdeuce01 he is just a dirty old man who shoves his head up his gay boyfriends assholes. And remember he is @Fpurd

[FourDeuce01]

@patriotsundergod

"Is that how you alienate religious people who are trying to open their minds to your way of thinking?"

There you go lying again. People who are "trying to open their minds" don't go around posting lies. That is NOT opening your mind.

"I haven't been on a crusade against your beliefs."

Right. You've just been here on Youtube posting stupid lies.