Bell Quad Tilt Rotor (QTR)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
24,522
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 27, 2009

Bell Helicopter video animation from 2006 showing an possible operational scenario involving its Quad Tilt Rotor (QTR) heavylift rotorcraft concept and an unmanned derivative of the Bell-Agusta BA609 civil tiltrotor.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • These must be real, the fact that someone took the time to make this video makes theis craft all the more real, somwhere in the usa these craft are hidden in top secret facilitys laying in rest till we can fully perfect these machines. one day we will see these beast. one day.....

  • @superwout Yea i know none needed.

  • @valcan321 not worthy of a reply

  • @superwout You do realise that the companies getting to the Oil in Iraq are Chinese mostly right? Well there goes that one.

    And no one is getting anything from afghainistan........so that one too.

    And we got into Vietnam because of a democrat named kennedy. And we did so because communist backed rebelion against Vienamese and French allies right?

    ----------------------------

    Of course you could explain how Obama the Un Neo-con got us into more wars world wide than Bush and those Neo-cons...

  • "the global war on terror" , the neocons' excuse to create a new enemy to scare television- and religion- indoctrinated consumption addicts after the Commies' collaps and to run the US into TWO (2!!!) bloody , useless wars for oil and minerals and a financial abyss

    Bell profitted from Vietnam and now from Iraq and Afghanistan , GO FUCK YOURSELVES AND THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX WITH YOUR "QTR" , I hope that big thing tears your ASS

  • @AIRdomination It would look less retarded with a vertical tail too :P

  • @arielwollinger I suppose not, but I think it would be more economic. It would use less computer resources that could go to something more else. That and for an aircraft built like the QTR I think it would be better WITH vertical stabilization. But yeah I suppose you're right. The B-2 is a living example.

  • @AIRdomination no need for vertical stabilizers.

  • @syco50 props do the job without the massive fuel consumption associated with jet engines

  • why not use jet rather than props?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more