Bell Helicopter video animation from 2006 showing an possible operational scenario involving its Quad Tilt Rotor (QTR) heavylift rotorcraft concept and an unmanned derivative of the Bell-Agusta BA609 civil tiltrotor.
These must be real, the fact that someone took the time to make this video makes theis craft all the more real, somwhere in the usa these craft are hidden in top secret facilitys laying in rest till we can fully perfect these machines. one day we will see these beast. one day.....
@superwout You do realise that the companies getting to the Oil in Iraq are Chinese mostly right? Well there goes that one.
And no one is getting anything from afghainistan........so that one too.
And we got into Vietnam because of a democrat named kennedy. And we did so because communist backed rebelion against Vienamese and French allies right?
----------------------------
Of course you could explain how Obama the Un Neo-con got us into more wars world wide than Bush and those Neo-cons...
"the global war on terror" , the neocons' excuse to create a new enemy to scare television- and religion- indoctrinated consumption addicts after the Commies' collaps and to run the US into TWO (2!!!) bloody , useless wars for oil and minerals and a financial abyss
Bell profitted from Vietnam and now from Iraq and Afghanistan , GO FUCK YOURSELVES AND THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX WITH YOUR "QTR" , I hope that big thing tears your ASS
@arielwollinger I suppose not, but I think it would be more economic. It would use less computer resources that could go to something more else. That and for an aircraft built like the QTR I think it would be better WITH vertical stabilization. But yeah I suppose you're right. The B-2 is a living example.
These must be real, the fact that someone took the time to make this video makes theis craft all the more real, somwhere in the usa these craft are hidden in top secret facilitys laying in rest till we can fully perfect these machines. one day we will see these beast. one day.....
MultiIPwnage 1 week ago
@superwout Yea i know none needed.
valcan321 4 months ago
@valcan321 not worthy of a reply
superwout 4 months ago
@superwout You do realise that the companies getting to the Oil in Iraq are Chinese mostly right? Well there goes that one.
And no one is getting anything from afghainistan........so that one too.
And we got into Vietnam because of a democrat named kennedy. And we did so because communist backed rebelion against Vienamese and French allies right?
----------------------------
Of course you could explain how Obama the Un Neo-con got us into more wars world wide than Bush and those Neo-cons...
valcan321 4 months ago
"the global war on terror" , the neocons' excuse to create a new enemy to scare television- and religion- indoctrinated consumption addicts after the Commies' collaps and to run the US into TWO (2!!!) bloody , useless wars for oil and minerals and a financial abyss
Bell profitted from Vietnam and now from Iraq and Afghanistan , GO FUCK YOURSELVES AND THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX WITH YOUR "QTR" , I hope that big thing tears your ASS
superwout 4 months ago
@AIRdomination It would look less retarded with a vertical tail too :P
Helge129 6 months ago
@arielwollinger I suppose not, but I think it would be more economic. It would use less computer resources that could go to something more else. That and for an aircraft built like the QTR I think it would be better WITH vertical stabilization. But yeah I suppose you're right. The B-2 is a living example.
AIRdomination 7 months ago
@AIRdomination no need for vertical stabilizers.
arielwollinger 7 months ago
@syco50 props do the job without the massive fuel consumption associated with jet engines
thelvadamee14 8 months ago
why not use jet rather than props?
syco50 8 months ago