TEST Footage redrock M2_DVX100

DOF test handheld dvx100+M2+nikon lens

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• mini35
• m2
• dvx100
• dvx100a
• bdvx100b
• test
• footage
• redrock
• dof
• 35mm
• adapter
• video
• cinematography
• movie

[Angelofwhitefire]

what program did you use to get that text in the beggining?

[vvuvvu]

i used after effect

[marketmd]

Was this shot with a DVX100, 100A or 100B?

[vvuvvu]

dvx100 old one i did use for this footage.

thanks ^_^

[PARRAVISION]

red rock micro sucks! you can build one under $300 use a sony hvr v1u and you dont need asny adapter! the adaopter gives a crappy milky look and its always out of focus no matter what! see my videos

[vvuvvu]

You are not Professional. that's why -_-

you don't understand ture DOF.

[hiyoness]

What Nikon Lens did you use? This is great footage

[ryvac]

yours looks so nice compared to the other M2 footage on here. did you do something special? the mood is so good and has the film look. is it done by Color Correction?

[MHM4V3R1CK]

Yea man, just realized that. lol maybe someone else will benefit one day.. in a land far far away...

[stuartcohen36]

Hi, Yes that does help...thank you for the info. Unfortunately I wrote that about 5 months ago hehe, so went for the canon xha1 instead which does the job perfectly. Thanks again though.

[MHM4V3R1CK]

I have a dvx100 and theres 2 widescreen modes. 1 is squeeze the other is crop(not actually called crop). the squeeze mode simply uses a wider pixel aspect ratio (1.2 vs 0.9) so when you import into Premiere into a 16x9 project, there are no black lines, just a filled 16x9 video. I find is cleaner when seen on a large HDTV monitor on the squeeze mode rather than using letterbox crop and using the zoom function on the tv to compensate. Hope this helps.