[This is part 2 of Dr Jacoby's opening statement, affirming the existence of God.]
The debate between international Christian speaker Douglas Jacoby and agnostic and skeptic Michael Shermer took p...
[This is part 2 of Dr Jacoby's opening statement, affirming the existence of God.]
The debate between international Christian speaker Douglas Jacoby and agnostic and skeptic Michael Shermer took place Saturday June 23, the highlight of the 2007 International Apologetics Conference, sponsored by the Apologetics Research Society. The debate topic: Does God Exist?
Dr. Shermer is one of the three or four most famous atheist / agnostic scholars in the world, author of 12 books and President of the Skeptic Society. He has held dozens of debates, appeared on Oprah, 20/20, Dateline, Tom Snyder, Larry King Live and The History Channel. Dr. Jacoby, director of the Athens Institute of Ministry, has spoken in hundreds of cities in some 80 nations.
This exciting event was held before a packed house, with an overflow crowd watching close circuit monitors outside the venue. Kedron Jones (Board member of ARS) was moderator and affable host. Shermer and Jacoby both bring their best analytical skills to this debate. The interchange is lively, with both speakers willing to concede points made by their opponent. You will benefit greatly from weighing the arguments put forth. Douglas' clear and incisive arguments for the existence of God are persuasive. He argues from cosmology (both its creation and its complexity). and the unmistakable fact that moral absolutes are part of reality. Shermer makes the case that religions are socially constructed, historically dependent, and that the faith you adhere to and the god you believe in depend largely on when in history and where in the world you were born.
The two-hour debate is lively, engaging and instructional. You can watch each speaker's opening, rebuttal, rebuttal summary, and conclusion here at YouTube. For the entire debate in one DVD, however, including the 40+ minute Q&A session, please visit www.douglasjacoby.com. The Skeptics Society website is www.skeptic.com.
To post further comments, please visit Jacoby's forum at www.jacobyblogs.com.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
I can't believe that someone with a "Dr." in front of his name can't see that looking back at how inprobable an event is AFTER it happened tells you nothing. Just because the chance to win in the lottery is small doesn't mean noone ever wins it.
Hes such a missinformed noob.. but lets grant him that scientists believe nothing made something.. How did your god come about? ... oh well hes outside of nature.. blabla fuck you.
Religions are entitled to as much criticism as anything else. Why they should have some ingrained respect given to them is beyond me.
You are the ones believing in something which by its very nature would want you to discard any rational thoughts about the way the world works and completely ignore science. Religion and Science are both by their very nature completely incompatible. To say otherwise is completely "ignorant, stupid, needy, retarded" (delete as appopriate).
Out of courtesy I am having a few specials today: I'm a big fan of "Nazi Germany was a Christian nation perfectly situated for the holocaust," "how Christianity was derived from pre-existing pagan religions and how the early founders knew thins," "the strong correlation between Christianity and divorce, sexual deviancy, and serial killers" - I'm an expert in all three....I'm ready when you are - no name calling and tons of evidence to boot
The non-religious don't supply evidence? For what? Get me started I'm ready to go - evolution? contradictions in the Bible? the fact that we don't get our morality from "Judeo-Christian values"? separation of Church and state? I'm excited.....you start and I'll supply completely free of name calling too; I won't even charge extra
My biggest problem with the "life sitting on a knife's edge ergo God did it" argument is that it represents the complete antithesis of design. Did God not make the laws that would cause our destruction? (either side of the knife's edge) - if you understand the law of large numbers then our existence appears to be part of a completely random universe - that of a "blind watchmaker" ...there are too many riddles and unnecessary parts to make it design. Why rest your design on a knife's edge?
3 Matthew 7:12 - very nice verse....unfortunately Jesus was a little late; Confucius, Lao Tse, Buddha, and about half a dozen ancient Greek and Roman philosophers had said it already centuries earlier - but don't worry, Jesus did bring something completely original to him - eternal hell: before him shoal and hades were the underworld but were not eternal places of damnation, what say you Jesus:
"Think not that I come to bring peace to earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword"
To follow in DeusMerdaeEst's path - 1. Morality is innate: look to nature; the animal kingdom has no religion and yet they develop their own moral codes and have organized families - how could that be? human beings also display similar moral characteristics with/without religion or despite differences in religion 2. If you do not think that God is a dictator - you have not read the Old Testament nor do you understand "sins of the father" as an ideological concept
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
You are the ones believing in something which by its very nature would want you to discard any rational thoughts about the way the world works and completely ignore science. Religion and Science are both by their very nature completely incompatible. To say otherwise is completely "ignorant, stupid, needy, retarded" (delete as appopriate).
Here is a list of "good Christian names" slung at Thomas Paine: Judas, reptile, hog, mad dog, souse, louse, archbeast, brute, liar, infidel"
Mike Huckabee recently referred to atheists (as a group) as narcissists
Do you want me to send you my hate mail from Christians or should I direct you to Richard Dawkin's hate mail from Christians?
"Think not that I come to bring peace to earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword"
Matthew 10:34
2. If you do not think that God is a dictator - you have not read the Old Testament nor do you understand "sins of the father" as an ideological concept