Pascal's Wager
Loading...
Uploader Comments (litdoc1999)
All Comments (22)
-
Problem with this video is it is written by someone that has a passing thought not a real argument. First off believing is a choice and multiple choices come from that choice. Second, even if you don't believe you have knowledge of a god and so you can still speak to both crowds in that general sense and provoke thought. And lastly if you believe then you need not choose a god to believe in as you already have or you wouldn't believe in the first place.
Seems to be someone young in thought.
-
For me, pondering god's existence is better than not pondering it. This wager assumes God will punish the unbeliever based on false teachings. We must give God a headache with our nonsense"When our iniquities rise to heaven"(God's migraine).
-
actually this video is wrong pascal goes on in his journal and says follow the ones that believe and try to believe in god not pretend
hes just trying to help the reader to make a decision and then to follow that decision by believing in god
-
Keeping a perserved consiousness forEVER is just way too long heaven or hell. <100 years is kinda low too but still.
-
"simply believing"
ok then
i promise you a dollar if you "simply believe" in the purple dwarf that lives in my closet.... i dont mean pretend you believe... i mean actually believe in him...
what you cant? oh ye of little faith....
-
"But, I ask you, why not believe in God? Why not put your true, loving belief in something greater? Why not? "
why not believe in a giant panda that gives out candy? Why not put your true, loving belief in the candy panda? why not?
-
"Tell me of a religion that have the promised of heaven SIMPLY FOR BELIEVING?"
What if I invent one?
-
This only works if we aren't 100% sure if christianity is true or not.
Seeing as the god of the bble doesn't live up to the description of himself in his own word then we can be sure that christianity is false.
We don't need to wager, becuase it's a certainty that christianity is false.
-
I posted a video response, I am sure you will approve it.
We can all use both views in any discussion.
-
Yeah, AA tells people that too, their numbers are LOWER than those who try to quit on their own.
4:23
RICHARD DAWKINS - PASCAL'S WAGERby RenaiSpirits4,113 views- 0:42
Richard Dawkins on Pascal's Wagerby prosumption17,054 views
- 4:48
Pascal's Wagerby askegg13,913 views
- 2:46
Kirk Cameron disproves Pascal's wagerby ArgusEyes105,339 views
- 4:13
Pascal's Wager. Creation vs Evolution. Atheists Agree with Godby elijahsfire2,561 views
- 1:19
RE: Pascal's Wager - Proving that atheists are retarded.by naejimba2,628 views
- 2:19
Pascal's Wager Debunkedby qwints87,221 views
- 4:45
Pascal's Wager is NOT a valid argument!by RabidApe9,072 views
- 1:24
Richard Dawkins - "What if you're wrong?"by ScientificSkeptic269 views
- 3:20
Nichols' "Wager"by TheKidFrom13thStreet347 views
- 2:53
Christopher Hitchens: Pascal's wager = religious hucksterismby bassandit109,954 views
- 4:02
Pascal's Wager - Expandedby GBart1,335 views
- 2:21
Hitchens on Pascal's Wagerby silverstream31422,126 views
- 4:35
I bet you don't know this about Pascal! - ACCFby TheJulia0443,981 views
- 9:24
Pascal's wager as a decision problemby trondreitan747 views
- 24:38
Richard Dawkins reads the new preface to The God Delusionby RabidApe3,976 views
- 6:41
Catalyst West 2010: Dallas Willard Part 1by CatalystConference15,190 views
- 6:38
How to Pwn a YEC - Pascal's Wagerby JaguarJ0nes37,043 views
- 3:12
Climate Change: The Pascal's Wager Fallacyby williampinn750 views
- 8:50
Pascal's Wager - It Doesn't Workby DeltaAtheism1,346 views
That's because god(s) cannot be defined.
litdoc1999 4 years ago