Bart Ehrman, Interrupted: Exposing a Childish View of Scripture

Who's next? Well, it looks like it's finally time for Bart Ehrman to be on the receiving end of the power of the Christian Road Warrior's doomsday device, destroying all attacks against the Bible and the Christian faith with one arm tied behind his back.

In this brief video, the warrior details the problems of people like Bart who bring up the same old alleged contradiction and "discrepancy" claims against the Bible when these claims have been refuted for centuries.

For those interested in the warrior's book, you can go here:
http://www.amazon.com/Heals-Your-Eyes-Dont-Head/dp/0966610717/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_...

Don't forget to check out part 2 in this ongoing series refuting Bart's false claims:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWdTVOoW6fU

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Bart
• Ehrman
• Interrupted
• Christianity
• Bible
• Gospels
• Paul
• Christ
• Corruption
• Authenticity
• Misquoting
• Jesus
• Atheist
• Atheism
• Agnostic
• Agnosticism
• Fresh
• air
• Contradiction
• Revealing
• the
• Hidden
• Contradictions
• in
• BibleContradictions
• Scripture
• Revelation
• God
• YaHWH
• yahweh
• NPR

[Downfurlife]

I agree Bart is a worthless slob. He is intellectually dishonest, a fraud and no friend of atheism. This coward, who I have met, despite his education and the fact he has obviously researched & studied global religion and Christianity he still makes room for the ignorance & stupidity of religion. Without fact or evidence he still calls himself an agnostic - in MANY cases a borderline theist. I have no respect for people like this who make room for theism when they ought to be anti-theist. :)

[CRoadwarrior]

@Downfurlife I would agree he is intellectually dishonest AND arrogant and out mostly to make money by creating provocative books. He has an agenda. But arguing he should be an anti-theist is nonsense. He gives false comfort to atheists and muslims, who aren't discerning enough to realize they are being fooled by his facade of scholarship and intelligence.

[LovingScrubbies]

Is he Bart Ehrman or Bart Simpson. Oh! He's Bart ErrorMan.

Sam Harris's debates with Rabbi Wolpe and Dennis Prager were very cool.

[CRoadwarrior]

@LovingScrubbies LOL Bart ErrorMan. Nice. 

[Oallos1]

CRoadWarrior,

Your video here was pioneering.

Atlast, the christians have come together with a more formal response to Bart Ehrman via a youtube channel called "EhrmanProject"

and also

EhrmanProject (dot) com

Hope you enjoy the reponses to his claims.

Also, a new DVD entitled "The battle to discredit the bible" responds to Ehrman and other claims and is an excellent resource for all believers. The DVD is broken down into clips which are featured on my bible archaeology playlist - Go see !

[CRoadwarrior]

@unclexbob The point is, Bart is not doing what he does because he's just such a caring and nice guy who wants people to know the "truth." He gets paid outrageous amounts to speak or debate. But the fact remains, as I point out in the vids, that some of the questons he raises have been addresed BEFORE he was even born. So it is intellectually dishonest to pretend as if no one has addressed his false concerns and contradiction claims.

[CRoadwarrior]

@elguapochango And in this series, when I have time to do more videos, I will provide more evidence of his flawed interpretations and prove them to be in error in detail. After that, you and others will have no excuse for accepting his false and erroneous claims.

[CRoadwarrior]

@elguapochango Actually, I do make a real argument against Bart, just not in the way YOU wish . I do study the Bible on a more academic level, on a more excellent level than Bart because he has no Spirit led understanding. He makes wild assumptions and other mistakes which many scholars have pointed out. You would do well to read about them.

[CRoadwarrior]

@onemarktwoyou That is interesting, considering the fact that Bart tries to teach how unreliable and inaccurate the text of the NT is. What Ehrman are you talking about? The one before he lost his mind at Princeton or the one after? lol. You would do better to hear Dr. Gary Habermas, Dr. William Lane Craig, Dr. N.T. Wright, Dr. Norman Geisler or Dr. Craig Blomberg. These are the men who are better suited to learn the Gospels from.

[onemarktwoyou]

My faith has been reaffirmed by Mr. Ehrman.I find he actually helped me understand why the gospels were reliable,and in what way they are reliable.I do believe it is necessary for men of faith to learn the historicity of the text,instead of allowing a preacher with only personal financial reasons to teach you.And generally preachers are lacking the knowledge of the text in the first place.It is important to read on the translations of the word to better to understand the intent of the word

[elguapochango]

Perhaps this has been said in previous comments, I do not wish to read them all. But you make no real argument agaisnt Ehrman. You hold up books that have supposeably proved him wrong but don't mention how, and the quotes you do read give no academic argument that would provide evidence that might persued someone to disagree with Bart Ehrman. The man makes his living researching the bible and the other topics he speaks on. You would do good to study the bible on a more adacemic level.