Top Comments
All Comments (527)
-
@matthew33179 35% on 200k would be 70k. Also, that's one of the dumbest tax plans I think I've ever heard. 8% on 200k is already 16k, that's why tax is a PERCENT.
-
Lamborghini was at like 4k rpm on that second race... takes like 20 years for rpms to rise.. fail!
-
well i hope the percentage of tax on the car is a special one. nnot the same percent that normal people pay, when buying a regular car. i would say..a 35% tax would be fair. so, ya, a 200,000 car should cost you at least 260,000 thousandish. so ya, you should be paying AT LEAST 60,000 JUST in taxes, if you can afford to buy a car like this, 60,000 is nothing. its the equivalent to 20 buks for me. so its definitely fair.
-
@jamesunit19 umm beacuse people who havre this kind of car have too much money? and they need to give back to the less fortunate.
-
@matthew33179 reason is because why? nothing dangerous about mature, trained people going fast in a straight line. WTF does that have to do with taxes?
-
@matthew33179 Why exacly?
-
anyone who drives cars like this, better be giving up at least 200k a year to taxes, and charities i hope!
-
@steven09999 i hope you pay at least 200k in taxes a year right?
-
your an idiot. Did you read the description? 335 was mine BTW. I sold it and got an M3
, MODDED LAMBO- reduced weight, exhaust, ect.
when driver of galardo see that BMW is tooking him he breaks
PavelsHDchanel 3 weeks ago 34
@LilTrippStar there is a major difference between the power an engine develops (bhp) and the actual power that reaches the wheels (whp). there reads it develops 460 ALL WHEEL HORSEPOWER (that´s around 560hp coming from the engine).
3O2MuStAnG 1 week ago 2