Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

HammerHead Testing Conclusion

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,210
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 29, 2009

my conclusions after the hammerhead test

link the videos - http://www.youtube.com/user/PunkWorksPaintball

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (gerglmuff)

  • Just so you know, in science your data is dismissed as inconclusive automatically because your standard deviation for the measurements of the 'x' and 'y' are much larger than the averages themselves. You would see this right away if you actually publish data in a proper way, not just in a table format (which hides this). If you graph your data you will see the error bars are HUGE and show that no differences or comparisons can be made.

  • @titus131988

    that isn't even close to true. the numerical value of the mean has no bearing on the standard deviation. this is becuase the mean is an average of positive and negative values, and ideally would be zero.

  • @gerglmuff I know how you want it to be, but you wont see what I'm talking about unless you actually try a statistical test like ANOVA. Not to mention, you can't persuade anyone who actually do research, you need to show statistical analysis to prove that it isn't by chance that you achieved your results. Having a larger mean or equal means nothing. You would see with your data that even though the means are similar, the SD are so large statistical significance can't be generated.

  • @titus131988

    we publish all our data, so if you want to do ANOVA feel free. do whatever you want with the data, feel free.

    the mean means nothing in this data set. that is just the center of the pattern. the Standard deviation shows how large and destrubted the data is, or how large the pattern is. this is what we are measuring. we are not comparing means, we are comparing pattern sizes.

  • I have to say your review was a lot of effort for nothing, for one you go off about not seeing spin but your high speed camera maybe shows 10 frames of the paintball in flight and is very grainy so yes spin is not observable do to you using poor equipment. secondly you claim to not be able to post your accuracy tests because your computer will crash. Bullshit!!! how many 12 year olds have accuracy tests on you tube? give me a break. I own a hammerhead and love it. This review is crap

  • @skralogy

    we actually have measured everything from about 30 rpm up to 25000+ rpm with our camera, so it is more the capable of capturing the spin from a hammerhead.

see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Best barrel kit = bag full of CP one pieces.

  • HATER MOFO FTW

  • that's it i'm sticking to my proto 1pc barrel LOLZ!!!

  • maybe if you use first strike rounds and a hammerhead barrel. So you could test first strike rounds with the cp .685 and the bangstikks and the mofo and then test the hammerhead barrel. 

  • I use a BangStikxx with a Python sizer kit on my Tippmann A5 and at the beginning of each new box I size the paint. The barrel makes an amazing difference to both accuracy and range. I have easily out ranged other A5's in the same conditions using lesser barrels

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more