YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

The Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor: Why Didn't This Happen (and why is now the right time?)

GoogleTechTalks GoogleTechTalks·1,782 videos
147,743
77,037
Like     Dislike 19

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like GoogleTechTalks's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike GoogleTechTalks's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add GoogleTechTalks's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Dec 22, 2011

Google Tech Talk
December 16, 2011

Presented by Kirk Sorensen

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • steverg2

    The oil industry doesn't have any "power" of their own, they're just people pulling resources out of the ground and selling them. The power lies in the force of the state, and their ability to use that force keep the market closed. In absence of a state, the oil industry has no means to secure this monopoly. Diffused, smaller potential benefits to consumers vs. concentrated, huge potential losses for a small group. The small group will always try to corner the market with state force.

    · 3

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate steverg2's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate steverg2's comment.
    in reply to thijsjong (Show the comment)
  • Karriem Perry

    Write your Congressperson and tell them!!!!

    · 2

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Karriem Perry's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Karriem Perry's comment.

All Comments (280)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • vlad jave

    has any body asked " why don't we just start building copies of ORNL reactor just to start us on MSR and then improve on this when money starts pouring in " ?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vlad jave's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vlad jave's comment.
  • mykmlr

    Another lie. 30 years MINIMUM to build the very first fusion reactor, and 40 years MINIMUM to design and build an LFTR fleet.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.
    in reply to Tom Delta (Show the comment)
  • mykmlr

    Yes, let's engineer better safer ways to do things.

    Like mandate solar and terminate nuclear.

    Easy and simple. Use the great minds to NOT do nuclear.

    See?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.
    in reply to Tom Delta (Show the comment)
  • mykmlr

    No. Every attempt to upconvert to the 'magic ratio' have failed, only producing MORE reactor waste.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.
    in reply to Tom Delta (Show the comment)
  • mykmlr

    Helium cooling cannot be used for the 'drag out' I mentioned. Give it up. The China Syndrome is a result of LOC which WILL happen with a thorium reactor because of the 235U reactor core.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.
    in reply to Tom Delta (Show the comment)
  • Tom Delta

    I never once said 232Th is self sustainable. You mentioned of 'China syndrome'

    Helium cooling can be utilized, Radon > Polonium can be managed during their decay to alpha isotopes

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tom Delta's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tom Delta's comment.
    in reply to mykmlr (Show the comment)
  • mykmlr

    One more time. 232Th will not self sustain. THEREFORE: TONS of 2% 235U / 8%239Pu reactor core with 232Th as a JACKET is the bare minimum for chain reaction.

    As for 3He cooling, forget it. 3He leaks and drags 222Ra out with it. It will pass through 1" stainless. So much for that idea.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.
    in reply to Tom Delta (Show the comment)
  • Tom Delta

    Yes well, the enrichment politics have to stay in place... for a reason.

    Only familiar with the "THTR-300 ...helium-cooled...uranium-235 / thorium-232 fuel... graphite matrix"

    Only stating operations were not unclassified/advanced... for political reasons & public opinions.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tom Delta's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tom Delta's comment.
    in reply to mykmlr (Show the comment)
  • mykmlr

    BTW, that was ALUMINA, not aluminum. I was pointing out that the only experienced people on earth working in Fluorine are the aluminum smelters and NOTHING keeps that corrosive stuff in.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mykmlr's comment.
    in reply to daobagua (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later