The Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor: Why Didn't This Happen (and why is now the right time?)
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like GoogleTechTalks's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike GoogleTechTalks's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add GoogleTechTalks's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Dec 22, 2011
Google Tech Talk
December 16, 2011
Presented by Kirk Sorensen
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
1:10
The Thorium Dream (Trailer)by MOTHERBOARDFeatured
65,569
-
59:50
Aim High: Using Thorium Energy to Address Environmental Probby Google Tech Talks
37,202 views
-
1:07:16
Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Ideaby GoogleTechTalks
28,077 views
-
1:22:09
Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactorby Google Tech Talks
90,490 views
-
1:37:42
The Extended Mind: Recent Experimental Evidenceby Google Tech Talks
295,856 views
-
67
videos
Play all
Nuclear Power-Liquid Thorium Fuel-Good!by K4Fusion
-
40:21
1961 Nuclear Reactor Meltdown : The SL-1 Accident - United States Army Documentaryby Trains, Planes, Cars, Rockets
27,283 views
-
29:01
THE THORIUM PROBLEM - Danger of existing thorium regulation to U.S. manufacturing and energy sectorby gordonmcdowell
48,478 views
-
12:30
Thorium reactors and their feasibility: Thomas Drolet on Cambridge Houseby Cambridge House
2,802 views
-
5:23
The Space Elevator - no longer Science Fictionby dglrmuc
57,391 views
-
34:08
ORNL Thorium Molten Salt Reactor Experiment Researchers - Dick Engel & Syd Ball - Dinner & Interviewby Gordon McDowell
6,399 views
-
2:54
View Inside - Chernobyl's - Nuclear reactor 25 years afterby karaizz930528
442,787 views
-
1:27:16
Energy from Thorium - How to power the world of out future - Daniel Thompson - Truthjuice Bristolby Truthjuice Bristol
1,310 views
-
40:40
Is Nuclear Waste Really Waste?by GoogleTechTalks
25,763 views
-
1:37:13
Kirk Sorensen @ MRU on LFTR - Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactorsby Gordon McDowell
30,556 views
-
39:11
Kirk Sorensen - A Global Alternative (thorium energy via LFTR) @ TEAC4by Gordon McDowell
11,034 views
-
8:56
ADSR Energy from Thoriumby energyamplifier
8,198 views
-
2:36:45
Kirk Sorensen @ PROTOSPACE on Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactorsby gordonmcdowell
14,689 views
-
2:24
Fusion Reactor First Test Runby userjjb
397,638 views
-
1:14:54
Our Place in the Cosmosby GoogleTechTalks
37,662 views
-
20:13
David LeBlanc - Potential of Thorium Fueled Molten Salt Reactors @ TEAC3by gordonmcdowell
6,115 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
steverg2 2 months ago
The oil industry doesn't have any "power" of their own, they're just people pulling resources out of the ground and selling them. The power lies in the force of the state, and their ability to use that force keep the market closed. In absence of a state, the oil industry has no means to secure this monopoly. Diffused, smaller potential benefits to consumers vs. concentrated, huge potential losses for a small group. The small group will always try to corner the market with state force.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Karriem Perry 1 month ago
Write your Congressperson and tell them!!!!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (280)
vlad jave 1 hour ago
has any body asked " why don't we just start building copies of ORNL reactor just to start us on MSR and then improve on this when money starts pouring in " ?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mykmlr 22 hours ago
Another lie. 30 years MINIMUM to build the very first fusion reactor, and 40 years MINIMUM to design and build an LFTR fleet.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mykmlr 22 hours ago
Yes, let's engineer better safer ways to do things.
Like mandate solar and terminate nuclear.
Easy and simple. Use the great minds to NOT do nuclear.
See?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mykmlr 22 hours ago
No. Every attempt to upconvert to the 'magic ratio' have failed, only producing MORE reactor waste.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mykmlr 22 hours ago
Helium cooling cannot be used for the 'drag out' I mentioned. Give it up. The China Syndrome is a result of LOC which WILL happen with a thorium reactor because of the 235U reactor core.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Tom Delta 1 day ago
I never once said 232Th is self sustainable. You mentioned of 'China syndrome'
Helium cooling can be utilized, Radon > Polonium can be managed during their decay to alpha isotopes
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mykmlr 1 day ago
One more time. 232Th will not self sustain. THEREFORE: TONS of 2% 235U / 8%239Pu reactor core with 232Th as a JACKET is the bare minimum for chain reaction.
As for 3He cooling, forget it. 3He leaks and drags 222Ra out with it. It will pass through 1" stainless. So much for that idea.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Tom Delta 1 day ago
Yes well, the enrichment politics have to stay in place... for a reason.
Only familiar with the "THTR-300 ...helium-cooled...uranium-235 / thorium-232 fuel... graphite matrix"
Only stating operations were not unclassified/advanced... for political reasons & public opinions.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mykmlr 1 day ago
BTW, that was ALUMINA, not aluminum. I was pointing out that the only experienced people on earth working in Fluorine are the aluminum smelters and NOTHING keeps that corrosive stuff in.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube