(rant) Nibiru Nutjob 90377 Sedna

90377 sedna wikipedia article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/90377_Sedna

Kuiber Belt (wikipedia is crap but easy for nutbars to process)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuiper_belt

╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝



http://www.youtube.com/user/RobLesterArchive
http://www.youtube.com/user/roblesterfilms
http://www.youtube.com/user/robertwlester

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• 90377
• sedna
• nibiru 2012
• conspiracy theory
• Nibiru
• Nutbar
• 90377 Sedna
• planet x
• 2012 nibiru
• nibiru conspiracy
• nibiru sedna
• brown dwarf
• rant
• WTF
• ranting
• blog
• roblesterfilms
• orbit
• science
• sky
• map
• wikipedia
• Kuiper belt
• planets
• planetoid
• pluto
• nasa
• government
• NWOconspiracygroup

[Dominodude55]

and it's funny, because in 11 400 years there'll probably more religious rejects claiming sedna is some sort of end theory thing

but stupid bullshit aside, I think the idea of a planetoid with such a huge orbit is extremely awesome

[roblesterfilms]

@Dominodude55 its very cool

[fomalhauto]

It's not a kuiper belt object. It's considered a detached object and a hypothesized Oort Cloud object

[roblesterfilms]

@fomalhauto thanks for correction 

[NWOConspiracyGroup]

Thanks for the FREE Advertising of my Username and page

[roblesterfilms]

@NWOConspiracyGroup no worries, i dont mind that, if any flakes want to go to you good luck to them :-)

[tmcdon4ld]

@tmcdon4ld And one more thing near the end of the paper, it is also hypothesized that there are probably a hundred objects in a similar orbit and that 5 of them are probably visible currently.

[tmcdon4ld]

Also to add a little fodder for the quote un quote nibiru frack tards out there.

see the paper "Discovery of a canidate inner Oort cloud planetoid" by Michael E. Brown section 4.2 where it is hypothisized that Sedna was perturbed in to its orbit by a solar mass object moving perpendicular to the ecliptic of the solar system. Sorry mate you will be hearing a lot more about sedna from the planet X/ Nibiru crowd for the next century or at least till 2012.

[Dominodude55]

@tmcdon4ld That's true, everything is subject to changes, but Sedna's been around for how many millions of years? I'm sure if it were going to, it would have by now.

[tmcdon4ld]

@Dominodude55 I understand that it will most likely not be a visible object from here on earth. Also it is going to be at it present distance or closer for the next 144years so it has some opportunity for warming and change.

[tmcdon4ld]

@tmcdon4ld its color as viewed through a sweet telescope it is hardly the most luminous object out there. I would cite the wikipedia page for sedna

last sentence second paragraph and the first sentence second paragraph under the heading physical characteristics.

[Dominodude55]

@tmcdon4ld It definitely has the most erratic orbit, but I don't think it's the second reddest object in the sky, considering it comes as close to the sun as about twice the orbit of Pluto. Sedna will most likely never be seen be the naked eye.

Nibiru honestly doesn't exist, So I'm not sure why people keep saying it does. I'm not saying you have, I'm just annoyed is all. But yes, I wouldn't think Sedna is a threat if I were you, Just let the thought dissolve in your brain or something, lol.

[tmcdon4ld]

@Dominodude55 and the second reddest object in the sky. The discoverers feel that it was pulled in to its orbit by a passing sun. Its period would have brought around last during the end of the last ice age and supposed deluge dates.

I would not say its Nibiru but the thought has certainly crossed my mind and Sedna certainly has my attention.

[mrlordpancakes2]

im pretty sure that the people who thought sedna was a brown dwarf didnt know that a brown dwarf was a failed star and plus the original idea of nibiru or doomsday was most likely a joke but with the average amercan I Q of 40 u cant be suprised with how some amercans overeacted thinking it was real and told other mental retards around the world who willing believe anything they hear without compelling evidence