Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The John Calvin - Michael Servetus Affair.wmv

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,395
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 19, 2009

Dr. James E. McGoldrick of GPTS addresses the Calvin Servetus affair

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to Dave Hunt on John Calvin.wmv
see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Saul of Tarsus came into conflict with the Christian community of his time. He too, like the Pharisees of whom he was a one, believed that God is one and not three separate persons in one Godhead. Did the Christian community take revenge and murder him for his erroneous beliefs? No Christian has the right to kill anyone, no matter to whatever belief system he belongs. The Christian duty is to present them with the Gospel. Calvinists do not know what repentance and faith UNTO SALVATION means.

  • google : discovered-new-works-and-true-­identity-of-michael-servetus-p­roofs .you will get the scoop it

  • for the true identity of Servetus ( Miguel de Villanueva) and also his 10 new works, u can check this scoop it ,

  • Poor man, indeed, the world did not administrate for him the same justice he wanted for the others.

  • Michael Servetus" If i have spoken, it is for saying i think it is wront to kill a person for defending an idea, for even teh great ones have commited mistakes. If so , we would have to burn mortals a thousand times. Nobody recognizes its own mistakes, let god provide us wisedom to see ours."............ and also " To kill a man is not to defend a doctrine, it is to kill a man"

  • Luther king cheated on his wife, and Polansky raped a person. Lets be fair, it was bad, worse than calvinists think , though I still think Calvin was somehow sorry inside, and thats why he wrote and wrote and wrote about how bad servetus was, after his death.

  • All theology apart , Calvin acted realy bad with Servetus. None sais it would be a bad man. But men who do great things can make mistakes too, Dikens, Rousseau, Einstein ( chauvinist). But sincerely , he was the orchestrator of the persecution of Servetus. And the truth is he planned it for years, 3 years before 1553. And yes, it is a big bad action of a big intellectual. What is the problem with that.

  • Calvin betrayed Servetus, ( by the way new information and documents proof his true name was Michel de Villeneuve, Servetus was a name used for theological aspects or confronting conflict) Calvin insulted servetus a lot, attacked hiim untill he got to murder him, and attacked him after he was dead. Calvin also lied saying thatin the letters he sent to the Vienne Isere, was saying that the writte was De Villeuve and Servetus, but none of this names ever appear, It is a lie.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more