Breda 30 calibro 6,5 Carcano 2
Top Comments
All Comments (64)
-
quanti colpi porta nel caricatore quest'arma?
-
wash ur empty head , trolling child brain and try to grow up, u really need it ....!
-
the Carcano M/38 " Terni " : it was different from the original M91 because, f.i., the iron sight's distance was shorter ( 200m ) , it had a 6 round ammunition package , and so on .....
That said, you'd better to get back to your usual stuff and learn to debate over subjects you really have any idea about , weapons and guns definitely are not among them ...!!
I talk upon ttrue issues and by my knowledge, you can only spell stupid and ridiculous senseless asinine comments , you brainless moron
-
Another bizarre and hilarious bs said by this trolling retard, is about the " heavy mannlicher action ( what fucked does it mean HEAVY ACTION ...) using cartridge packets " : nobody firing with this weapon even today finds big problems with cartridge and aiming system, pribably you misunderstood some problems the Finnish soldiers ahd with a less accurate and cheaper version of this model Finland bought on WWII .
It's widely known that finnish soldiers were not taught and trained in using
-
for the allied soldiers and definitely cut off !
That's the " crafted and feautured " N.4 MK1 is all about , the shit that in ur clueless thiny brain is an amazing weapon !!
As x the Carcano mod 91 , get urself informed that this rifle and has no faults , its 300m- 400-2000m iron sight was a never seen innovation x that time and implementd with a telescopic sight works perfectly as proved by L. H. Oswald and as stated by all weapons experts and militaries ...!!
-
so any comparison is not only totally senseless & wrong , but also meaningless and illogic .
Read and learn, trolling idiot : the N. 4 MK1 is one of crappiest and most inaccurate weapons ever made, nicknamed pigsticker by british soldiers ( which by itself says a lot ) is a gross, heavy piece of useless iron that had huge problems with both bolt and trigger .
Just because of that it was replaced in 1941 by a simpler and lighter version, but the same this crappy enfield showed to be a danger
-
@Trulyloyale dude, your impotent ravings belong to someone to pity. you need psychiatric treatment.
-
only in his troll's dreams and his bullshiting comment , 'cos a holy truth to any who really knows of weapons is that the enfields made after 1910 are all crap and there's absolutely no " craftmanhsip and features " in their making . More , they were projected in such a bad way that even british and american soldiers used to make jokes about them for all XX cent. !!
The Nu.4 Mk1 ( which is the correct name and not a non-existing #4 MK1 ) was issued in 1941, while the Carcano mod. 91 in 1891
-
@hipsterical since you're clearly a brainless and stupid ITALIAN troll posting his ridiculous asinine comment full of bizarre statements and hilarious bs with absolutely no real ground , since you clearly have no idea of guns & weapons and posted ur funny bs as a typical clueless chatter of the web , I won't waste my time replying furtherly to you .
I only make this clear x any else : this dumb ( who , I repeat, is occasionally and unfortunatelly Italian )
owns the 2 guns he said
-
@hipsterical Certo, ma dato che la prima guerra mondiale finì effettivamente nel 1945 per quanto mi riguarda, la maggiorparte dei paesi dell'epoca si dotarono di governi fascisti nella forma. Il nostro fu certamente il più fallimentare.
It is an underpowered, instabel MG with a low rate of fire...poor MG
heikozzz 3 years ago 9
looks cool, but i guess it was crap, the loading system seems to be overcomplicated
wehrwolfsschanze2 4 years ago 7