Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Efficient Water Electrolysis For Hydrogen Production. 2/2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
9,571
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 29, 2006

Google Videos-
Author unknown. I DID NOT MAKE THIS VIDEO.
Experiments with efficient electrolysis, using a 2 inch outer tube and 1 1/2 inner.
I found this video on Google Videos and uploaded it here to YouTube. I knew immediately that this video needed to be promoted to as many people worldwide as possible to help validate the hydrogen from water movement. The technology has been kept hidden from us for hundreds of years. Mythbusters did a segment building an Oxyhydrogen generator using electrolysis, the design plans they used and technology was over 100 years old, and was something you'd expect a 8 year old kid to build. They did not use a system like the author here in this video, I'm quite sure had they followed this authors design their results would have been vastly different.
Here is the link for the other video-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzULkAOvris

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (SowhatNC)

  • hi!

    looks interesting, a huge amount of gas for only two tubes.

    are u using an ELECTROLYTE, or is that just plain tap water?

  • Unknown, I uploaded the video from Google video to see if anybody had any information or comments.

  • I did a voice print on this one and I am almost certain that it is Stan Meyer's voice, although on a discussion group on yahoo someone else claimed it as his.

  • I would disagree this videos author has more of a southern accent than Stanley Meyer.

  • The voice print indicate that the voice was identical to that of a known Stan Meyer sample.

  • Any thought on the videos time of recording?

see all

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • THIS IS NOT THE VOICE OF STAN MEYERS. I HAVE PERSONALLY HEARD HIM SPEAK. THIS IS UNQUESTIONABLY... NOT HIS VOICE. PERIOD! STAN HAD A TENDENCY TO SPEAK MUCH FASTER THAN THIS GUY, MUCH FASTER, SOMETIMES STUMBLING A TINY BIT, AS IF HIS MIND WAS GOING FASTER THAN HE COULD SPEAK. THIS GUY HAS A TENNESSEE LIKE COUNTRY ACCENT, OR NORTH CAROLINA, AND TALKS REAL SLOW, BUT FROM THE HHO PRODUCTION, IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THIS IS HIS FIRST TRIP TO MAYBERRY!

  • @ asims looks promising where can i get the plans to recreate this experiment are you you using ac or dc?what the huge caps for?someone already asked i know

    which is more efficient?no need to have the H seperate from O ,i mean doesnt brown gas burn better anyway?could you run an ICE or turbine engine connected to a generator with the brown gas produced from the reaction indefinitely as long as you supply water and electrolyte?if not what is the net energy gain

  • This is my video.. not Stan Meyer. Read the comment below about the video below. The results are obtained by increasing the temp. An increase of 20 degrees will raise gas production. Try it for yourself. Has been known for many years. It is not a deception. The higher the temp the better the production. High pressure and saturation with KOH raises the boiling point.The boiling point of water can be raised to F275 degrees by 10 of 15 pounds of pressure similar to a pressure cooker.

    Aubrey Sims

  • Ac does not work very well... try it and you will see.

    Aubrey Sims

  • This is 12 volts and 12 amps max, lowest levels shown were at 1/2 amp. Anyone can replicate this. I used KOH to saturation, water time is about 140 degrees. Heating the water moves the electrons into a higher shell making the polar bonds easier to split. Try it for yourself, easily reatable even without the PWM. It is for controlling the current draw... no other reason. Water can be disassoiacated at around 2300 degrees ( if I remember correctly) with no electrical input.

    Aubrey Sims

  • That was left from a previous experiment. I did a couple of 60 sec videos and because I was shooting it on a digital camera and that was the limit so I didn't have time to explain a lot.

  • If you use "line voltage" (which is alternating current), your cathode and anode will alternate (or switch places) 60 times a second, and you'll end up getting a mixture of H2 and O at both wires, instead of having each one dedicated to one gas.

  • Why does everybody use DC voltage for this stuff when they are collecting hydrodgen and oxygen at the same time anyways? The only reason to use DC is because one electrode makes O2 and the other H2, making it easier to collect just the hydrogen gas. It would be much simpler just to use line voltage for this than to use expensive DC power supplies which are current-limited anyways.

  • These videos were made by a guy called Aubrey Sims, he is on the forums, do a search, and ask him. Very nice guy! Again, not Stan Meyers, nor was he using step charge methods like a cap in this video! Ask him for full details!

  • who is this guy we all WANT TO KNOW THE STATS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more