Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Alient Spaceship Near Mercury (Nasa Images) Tv News 8 Dec.2011

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,299
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • wtf? Image artifact from 2 different angles? I smell bullshit.

  • nothing more than an "imaging artifact"...WTF does that mean?

see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If it's an imaging artefact, why are NASA spending all these billions on shit satellites? My camera phone cost £50 and I don't get "image artefacts" in my pictures.

  • @realisrealizerealies  Just more word-play from government agencies that try to make slick new terms to double talk and dance around the truth without having to answer a question directly.

  • Those of NASA,they think we are so stupid and do not know anything about space, what the hell !¿they think we are some kind of ignorant with mental deficit and then they come with this kind of ridiculous explanation we are not all ignorant and stupid that they can fool, only to see the astronaut's face I realized that is paid to tell lies,for them lying limits do not exist ...¬¬ shit is quite annoying seeing them with the smiles on their faces as if nothing really happened...bunch of liars!!!

  • WTF! Comparing one veiw point from the other view point, makes more questions than answers. If its an imaging artifact, then why does its appearance NOT coincide with the other. The first video shows the direction of the flare was Right to Left and the 'artifact' appears on the right, the side that gets hit first. Then on the second one, the flare is from Left to Right, BUT the 'artifact' appears on the side that his hit last. The artifact should be consistent with the direction of the flare.

  • Yea my girlfriend thought she was pregnant but I told her its just an "image artifact" I smell BS here Mr Fox news "expert"

  • He must be a total dumb ass to think that is an image artifact, he could have come up with something more convincing than that. But that definitely shows an solid object behind mercury, must be massive in size since its almost as big as planet mercury itself. No matter what they say there is definitely something behind mercury

  • These "solar flares" that are just so damned explainable, and they are so commonplace that it's no big deal.....yet we haven't seen this before...

  • @gameill you dont get the joke do u

  • @randomguyodst46 learn about science, not science fiction.

  • why wouldn't there be an alien spacecraft near Mercury? Why would there, yeah. but why dismiss it completely?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more