@intrepidorator What a schmuck... you "debunk" things by spinning stories that are so absurd only children and simpltons believe it; the molten metal was seen as the buildings were still burning and detected with heat-sensitive equip. before the clean-up crews were on site... FAILED AGAIN The "IQ over a 100" is your theory, no actual facts back that up... just spewing more and more shill propaganda. LMFAO@U
@threepercenter03 Yes the molen metal was from the cutting torches, wow you keep bringing up the same stupid stuff that has been debunked easily. You're mind is weak and you're delusional. 911 was terrorists hijacking planes and flying them into buildings, that is all it was. Everyone with an IQ over 100 knows it, The fact that you are unable to understand simple physics is why you're a conspiracy nut. Every thing that you have mentioned has been debunked, you're a simple minded fool.
@intrepidorator That's what they told you after it was discovered... you believed it, like a good shill. Still haven't debunked the molten metal seen dripping from the impact zone and pooled in the basement. Can't come up with a lie for that?
@threepercenter03 OMG.. I can't believe that you brought up the 45 degree angle sheers on the columns, They were cut with cutting torches during the clean up/ recovery. Look at the pictures. WOW you're too lame for words.
@intrepidorator You have not presented proof, you mentioned one article that was so slanderous that it couldn't be an unbiased piece, but neo-con spin to discredit anyone who would question how planes brought down three buildings in identical manner when the buildings were designed for such catastrophes. Video footage shows columns were sheared in a 45 degree angle and the beams were removed and sold to China before investigated... too many loose ends to believe your Bush B.S.
@threepercenter03 No, My point is that I have watched all of those conspiracy theory videos and found them all to be without evidence. I have shown you 2 of the many links to evidence that debunks the crazy theory that our govt planted explosives on the WTC and set them off after the planes were flown into them by terrorists. There is no evidence of explosives being present. None, What about "no evidence" can you not understand. You can go ahead and be a conspiracy nut, but I require proof..
@intrepidorator So, your argument for 9/11 is that I won't send you links, when the videos are available for you to watch... you can't type in '9/11' or 'WTC' or 'Bldg what?' but you can troll this site all day? No one's laughing at the truth, but we are laughing at you sheepish shills. You can live in your fantasy world where govt is your friend, your provider, your protector, but that doesn't change reality... how's life with your head in the sand?
@threepercenter03 What makes everyone else laugh so hard at you is that you actually think that you have made a single valid point. You have shown no evidence, you haven't even provided a single link that has any evidence that explosives were even present at the site of the collapse. If it is easy to google it, then send me the google searches that convinced you of a controlled demolition. I have provided 2 links to you that disprove it, I can find many more. You are the one with nothing.
@intrepidorator I can't count the number of times a shill has thought he proved 9/11 by claiming my lack of evidence... IT'S ON THE NET. How difficult is it for you to google-search it? Videos are everywhere, by multiple sources... it's news footage and private citizen's cameras. You used 1 questionable article by a magazine... give it a rest, shill, you have NOTHING.
@threepercenter03 Every statement that you make shows that you have no evidence to prove your ridulous theories. I have linked you to 2 sources that disprove your stupid controlled demolition theory. You provided me with 1 link that showed a man saying that the CIA knew that 1 of the hijackers had a passport. You have provided no evidence of explosives being present, instead all you have done is make crazy charges against me. You should just leave the thinking to those of us equipped for it. LOL
@intrepidorator What a schmuck... you "debunk" things by spinning stories that are so absurd only children and simpltons believe it; the molten metal was seen as the buildings were still burning and detected with heat-sensitive equip. before the clean-up crews were on site... FAILED AGAIN The "IQ over a 100" is your theory, no actual facts back that up... just spewing more and more shill propaganda. LMFAO@U
threepercenter03 6 months ago
@threepercenter03 Yes the molen metal was from the cutting torches, wow you keep bringing up the same stupid stuff that has been debunked easily. You're mind is weak and you're delusional. 911 was terrorists hijacking planes and flying them into buildings, that is all it was. Everyone with an IQ over 100 knows it, The fact that you are unable to understand simple physics is why you're a conspiracy nut. Every thing that you have mentioned has been debunked, you're a simple minded fool.
intrepidorator 6 months ago
@intrepidorator That's what they told you after it was discovered... you believed it, like a good shill. Still haven't debunked the molten metal seen dripping from the impact zone and pooled in the basement. Can't come up with a lie for that?
threepercenter03 6 months ago
@threepercenter03 OMG.. I can't believe that you brought up the 45 degree angle sheers on the columns, They were cut with cutting torches during the clean up/ recovery. Look at the pictures. WOW you're too lame for words.
intrepidorator 6 months ago
@intrepidorator You have not presented proof, you mentioned one article that was so slanderous that it couldn't be an unbiased piece, but neo-con spin to discredit anyone who would question how planes brought down three buildings in identical manner when the buildings were designed for such catastrophes. Video footage shows columns were sheared in a 45 degree angle and the beams were removed and sold to China before investigated... too many loose ends to believe your Bush B.S.
threepercenter03 6 months ago
@threepercenter03 No, My point is that I have watched all of those conspiracy theory videos and found them all to be without evidence. I have shown you 2 of the many links to evidence that debunks the crazy theory that our govt planted explosives on the WTC and set them off after the planes were flown into them by terrorists. There is no evidence of explosives being present. None, What about "no evidence" can you not understand. You can go ahead and be a conspiracy nut, but I require proof..
intrepidorator 6 months ago
@intrepidorator So, your argument for 9/11 is that I won't send you links, when the videos are available for you to watch... you can't type in '9/11' or 'WTC' or 'Bldg what?' but you can troll this site all day? No one's laughing at the truth, but we are laughing at you sheepish shills. You can live in your fantasy world where govt is your friend, your provider, your protector, but that doesn't change reality... how's life with your head in the sand?
threepercenter03 6 months ago
@threepercenter03 What makes everyone else laugh so hard at you is that you actually think that you have made a single valid point. You have shown no evidence, you haven't even provided a single link that has any evidence that explosives were even present at the site of the collapse. If it is easy to google it, then send me the google searches that convinced you of a controlled demolition. I have provided 2 links to you that disprove it, I can find many more. You are the one with nothing.
intrepidorator 6 months ago
@intrepidorator I can't count the number of times a shill has thought he proved 9/11 by claiming my lack of evidence... IT'S ON THE NET. How difficult is it for you to google-search it? Videos are everywhere, by multiple sources... it's news footage and private citizen's cameras. You used 1 questionable article by a magazine... give it a rest, shill, you have NOTHING.
threepercenter03 6 months ago
@threepercenter03 Every statement that you make shows that you have no evidence to prove your ridulous theories. I have linked you to 2 sources that disprove your stupid controlled demolition theory. You provided me with 1 link that showed a man saying that the CIA knew that 1 of the hijackers had a passport. You have provided no evidence of explosives being present, instead all you have done is make crazy charges against me. You should just leave the thinking to those of us equipped for it. LOL
intrepidorator 6 months ago