Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Exposed Kevin Jennings Obama's "Safe School Czar" part 5

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
589 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 28, 2009

This is what Obama and Kevin Jennings want to make our schools safe for our children. They are fundamentally changing our society and they are doing it through our children. Sound the Alarm America!

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Guest4000

    actually reading through some her comments which i must have missed in my very late night skimming through of these vids shows shes actually a rather large idiot, apologies on the insults, just sounded like some guy trying to be patronising to a woman which annoys me no end, apologies and insults taken back. ps on the point of bringing race into it, i am a white male so i dont much care if i use it as an insult though i have to admit white males tend to be rather idiotic.

  • @ourorboros2 And yet you completely ignore pataskalagirl's comments. How unsurprising... Sorry ouroboros2, but you have no ground to stand on seeing as you can't seem to fathom that I would respond in kind to someone who has been equally rude to me (you clearly didn't read her comments or just ignored them). Other than that, I have nothing to "argue" with you about seeing as you didn't put forth any substantive point other than to deride me and ignore the same behavior from pataskalagirl.

  • @Guest4000

    just shows a weak frightened (white?) man.

  • @Guest4000

    wow, you come across as a man(definitely) who has very little control over his life outside of the internet. you use words purposefully to try and put down others you are arguing with because you like to be in control and feel threatened when people dont instantly agree with you. at least thats what i've got from reading through your comments, save yourself some time when you come argue with me and dont bother with the insults as i dont care nor do most people and all in all it

  • Guest..I support all laws that are in force. Whether they are later or not. Sodomy under 18 should still be against the law there is nothing unconstitutional about protecting the young. There are many ways people use the constitution to do harm. Look at the church and state debate they use it in so many ways that the constitution did not call for. That was written to mean that the state could not force one religion on everyone. It did not mean people in govt could not express their religion .

  • "Defifinite and Done"

    Heh. Definite and done, indeed... You just expressed your support for an unconstitutional law. Just because it wasn't ruled unconstitutional until 2002 doesn't mean it was constitutional up until then. You really don't understand how Constitutional law works, do you? In any case, you support laws that are against the United States Constitution. Got it.

  • Guest .I told you we wil go with your take on this... Sodomy law was in effect till 2002. So Jennings didn't report a crime done to a teenage child..Defifinite and Done ...The guy is scum.

  • Oh, pataskalagirl, you empty-headed sweatheart you, you don't have to make stuff up, you know. How about this, honeybunch... point to the law on the web. If you can't or won't make a link then quote part or all of the text verbatim, and people can google it. That's right, put up or shut up, sweetie-pie. Let's see you lie your way of that, darling. I know I, for one, am looking forward to your backpedaling. :-)

  • Guest ..Your stupidity does not hurt my feelings sweetie. The law in question was the Massachusetts law on Sodomy in the early 80s. It only concerned those under 21. And they changed it in 89, I think. Alot of states had different laws on this subject, But the one concerning this subject (Jennings and his perverted act of ignoring a crime) was in Massachusetts, sorry to hurt your feelings but I don't know what state law you keep spewing about..Try to stay on subject sweetie.

  • Aw, honey-bunny, did I hurt your little feelings by pointing out the fact that the sodomy law in question never had an age limit, which is why it was ruled in 2002 as unconstitutional? Heh, talk about dense... you just get cuter and cuter (though, unfortunately, not any smarter)! ;-)

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more