Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Ghost Girl Photo (2/2) Out Of This World

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
154,750
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 6, 2008

A Ghostly Photogragh..Real or Fake? Last Part.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • You need to Google this - it's recently been exposed as a hoax. End of.

  • Besides the fact it was proven fake when they found the exact image off a postcard, you will know he is lying my the increased blinking, lip licking, and brow movement.

see all

All Comments (183)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • part 1 ?

  • @daddykornflakes Yes this is the final word, but why do you have to be so aggressive about it? I've experienced first hand ghostly activity at my sister's house (she lives in the Old Vicarage belonging to Seaton Delaval Hall) which is a listed building. They are no crack pots and even her daughter has reported things going on. If you don't believe then that's fine but don't be so patronising to those who have experienced such things because of your ignorance.

  • @Toops144 Okay, so you FINALLY realised it was a fake. What took you so long - didn't you watch the video, or maybe you're just a bit slow? Who needs the postcard as proof when the proof is already there in the video. And that really is my last word on this matter. At least we agree on one thing - it IS a fake!!!!

  • Why are there so many deluded people still trying to defend this photo, and photographer, as being genuine? The lab tests and hoaxer's reaction when confronted clearly show otherwise, plus to put the final nail in the coffin, the discovery of the photo he used to make the fake. This photo, despite what people are saying, matches the image in the burning building 100% Anyone saying otherwise is deluding themselves. It is the most blatant fake out there.

  • @daddykornflakes Well if you read on you will see that I was the first one to comment (after the initial comment to which I assume you're replying) that it was proven to be a hoax, so I don't know what you're talking about you idiot.

  • @Toops144 So the fact that the photo was virtually proven to be manipulated, the hoaxer's body language was that of a guilty man when he was confronted with the evidence, and to top it all the photo he used, to create the hoax, was discovered last year on a postcard matching it 100%, doesn't convince you it's a hoax. What more evidence do you need? A confession from the hoaxer? Well you can't get that because he's dead. So I guess you'll have to go on deluding yourself.

  • @APriceProduction How do you explain the fact that she looks exactly the same then, and her clothing and the way it folds match 100%? Every single thing 100%.

  • @APriceProduction It's the same person, same clothing exactly, same creases in same places exactly. The photo matches it 100%. Can you provide a reliable link where it reveals that "closer studies have shown that girl in the postcard is in fact a completely different girl"? Somehow I doubt it.

  • seems legit

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more