20 times more efficient. New invented JET turbine with 2P shaped blades

The power generated by new invented (patent pending) JET turbine with 2P shaped blades equal 14x100=1400 vs. power output of the conventional HAWT equal 3x23=69=69 with same diameter in the same wind conditions. (1400/70=20) The not optimized 2P JET propeller can increase the output by a factor of 20 in comparison with a conventional horizontal axis prop turbine.
New invented JET turbines are much more efficient because operate by both JET and LIFT mode of rotation.
In addition:
1.JET blades reduced tip losses significantly
2.Redirected flow properly
3.Converted centrifugal forces to an additional rotation torque
4.Operate in actuator cylinder (instead in actuator disk). See 2p JET blade rotor operates in inclined virtual cylinder at http://www.youtube.co/watch?v=mz8OEtMFJ5E
5.Reduced significantly wake flow speed at low incoming flow speed - it is like a diffuser augmented turbine
6. The noise emissions (sound level) of jet turbine is very low
7. etc......

The JET turbines operate very efficiently as both wind and under water devices.
See more at www.tonchev.org

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• new
• invented
• (patent
• pending)
• JET
• turbine
• 2P
• shaped
• blades
• horizontal
• axis
• win
• and
• hyfrokinetic
• river
• tidal
• HAWT
• noise
• emissions
• (sound
• level)

[ImUrtastyflava]

please please please tell me what this generator!

i need that!!

[TheTonchev]

@homskoult

The shown turbine is not to scale and not to right shape. It is a conceptual model only.

[homskoult]

the cross section of the blades is grossly unfair for gathering quantifiable data. Are you another Indian discovering something that has been around for a hundred years.

[1crazyfocker]

@TheTonchev what video facts? your the one who from what i can tell is unlawfully saying patent pending with out giving the number.

[TheTonchev]

@1crazyfocker

I am waiting your video facts only - no more words

[TheTonchev]

@1crazyfocker

I am waiting your video facts only - no more words

[1crazyfocker]

and i am repeating too, its a simple number that every one who ever truely has a patent pending gets..and ppl will choice for them selfs about your videos. its a number lets have it

[TheTonchev]

@1crazyfocker

I am repeating.

The shown is a fact.

No matter your ' empty' words

I and others are accepting only facts here. .

You can find my patents in all free patents data base/

Please send your patents as a numbers as example.

[1crazyfocker]

@TheTonchev you can think what ever you want, I am not the one running "test" so unevenly, you want me to do your test for you? you only did this test just so yo can bost of bigger numbers, which is fasle and says a lot about you, then when asked for the patent number you give a broken link. its simple its a number just type it out. you do that and i might just do w real compairison test.

[1crazyfocker]

so a bogus link, its a simple task the patnet number, and by your test it is 20x better, but its not a real comparison, think what you want. hell any one see this can tell that compairing one with 5 times the working surfice is going to be more efficant. I am sure its more effenicant but its no where close to 20times. i bet the reason you are useing such uneven compairisons is because you know its on like 5% or 10% better. just show facts, and a simple patent number scared i think