Top Comments
All Comments (24)
-
Sublime! Masterpiece!
-
@MrPietjePuck hmm. i accompanied the real version many times with singers, and i have to say this makes a nice change. i love the mellowness of the orchestra. interesting you cite Bocelli, as he is generally felt to have a nice voice but little interpretative skill. try veronique gens and see what you think. :)
-
well, it's a bit too slow. Anyway, I love his voice very much. Beautiful!
-
There are a lot of beautiful interpretations on youtube (Georges Thill and Andrea Bocelli for example) , but I really hate this version. It's supposed to be Andantino and 'dolce' and not Lento or even Grave what Robert Meadmore is doing here. I think it is terrible Kitsch and certainly NOT the tender and light version Faure ment!
-
This song is so beautiful!
-
@AlmaMortal2 Couldn't have said it better myself.
-
Literalmente destruyó esta hermosa pieza con su voz!!!
-
Beautiful! just beautiful!
Encore!
-
Nice !
-
@MrBrianIvan Typically r's are supposed to be flipped in sung French and German, even though they are not pronounced that way in the language. Obviously there are exceptions, but that's what I learned.
This is one of the truest interpretations I've ever found. The song of losing a lover conveyed with brilliance. HIs voice suites this song well.
AcerbusEquinomin 3 years ago 5
Very pretty voice....I would think the tempo would be unsingable, but Mr. Meadmore manages it very well. Bravo!
txtenor 3 years ago 5