Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

EU hypocrisy on Guantanamo

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
13,180
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 4, 2009

Daniel Hannan MEP giving a speech in the European Parliament on the hypocrisy of the EU's position towards detainees at Guantanamo.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • They were not in an Army, they were violating all the rules of war by dressing as civilians and other things I'm sure you don't care about.

    They have no rights and should have been executed rather than brought to Cuba so Eurofags and other anti-US elements around the world could whine about how we're so mean.

  • Run for Prime Minister!  You will win! You speak truth and the people know it

see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @rtekbillabong Oh yes the guards get punished for hurting the prisoners in America's secret torture prisons. They're completely safe for the uncharged detainees. NOT.

  • @rtekbillabong are u fucking insane ? not everyone at gitmo is guilty there are 16 years old children there

    guards dont get suspended for hitting prisoners they just take photo of raping them and put them on facebook !

    u fucking ape, international law doesnt allow you to tortue prisoners

  • @rtekbillabong

    And if u know the reason why torture is unconstitutional & wrong, u wouldnt ever consider doing such to another man unless u urself were sadistically evil.

    like they say, torture works. get me dick cheynee, a water board & an hour, i bet ill have him confessing to the oklahoma city bombings & calling you grandpa. course, if its done right, it wont even last a minute!

  • @rtekbillabong

    um yeah- firstly in a free society, individuals have fuckin rights regardless. And those detained- definitely have those rights. Innocent until proven guilty

    And second, self defense is self defense. But who is really defending whom? Cuz the US sure as hell has not been defending shit. It has protected the mega military-industrial complex, shielded select banks & industries, and sanctioned the use of terrorism both domestically & abroad.

  • As bigoted, cycloptic, gold-dumping fat c*nt Gordon Brown clings to power, regardless of the fact Labour lost the election, dirty dealing goes on behind closed doors. A coalition government is in the offing.

    As if that wanker should dare to subvert Democracy! But then ballot rigging by all means is Labour's specialty! They've done nothing but ruin the nation and now they want to carry on 'illegally'.

    Paste title: NEW LABOUR'S TOTALITARIAN ANTI-CHRIST DRUG DEALERS

  • Yeh he should run, he is at least openly a tory. I'd rather have an asshole in office who is openly an asshole than mr cameron.

  • Who is 0:18 aimed at? there only seem to be about six people in the room.

  • If I was one of those marketers in Iraq that Hannan spoke of, I would probably be very annoyed to find that I died because the United States released a criminal with no trial.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more