Richard Dawkins Responds To Ray Comfort

Dawkins has his own opinions on Ray Comfort's 54 page introduction.

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• banana man

[iamspid3rman]

lol I don't get what he's so afraid of? I mean rather than actually being serious about the accusation, he simply responds with ad hominem statement. And people believe this guy? lmfao

[deRoyLight]

@iamspid3rman Afraid of? He responds to it dismissively, just like you would respond to someone saying the earth is flat dismissively.

[JSAL323]

@deRoyLight Or how you would respond to someone who believes everything came from nothing. Oh wait....????

[deRoyLight]

@JSAL323 Who said everything came from nothing? The only one here claiming "everything came from nothing" are those that think the planets, animals and universe were poofed into existence by a magical being.

Sounds like you're projecting here.

[ec123456789able]

Short and to the point.

[2Corinthians10five]

Dawkins is one of teh most religous guys I have listened to



[mickeyvegas1]

ANYONE who does not believe in evolution with all of the available evidence is a retard. Funnily enough most people in developed countries believe evolution with the exception of the USA where a staggering 60% of the population dont believe it. It is as sound a theory as the theory of relativity. We should throw a few of them off of tall buildings and see if they believe in scientific theories then.

[whywecnthvnicethings]

@iamspid3rman

Can you give me some sources that quote "all mathematicians" on that? And how can believing in evolution require more faith than belief in a higher power, when empirical evidence exists for the former and not the latter?

[scottishguy100]

well said! ray comfort is ignorant and uneducated and is only seconded by Kent Hovind!

[iamspid3rman]

@macgyver12345678 The track record for science is not good at all. After all these years,the best science has come up with for our existence is the Big Bang Theory which all mathematicians say is basically impossible, and the Evolution, which takes more faith to believe than believing there's a higher power. I think it's mixture of arrogance and denial that jades the scientific community and fans of it.Science can't confirm the supernatural because there is no scientific method for it.

[iamspid3rman]

@macgyver12345678 By mere definition, miracles are not a scientific claim. So now that you've lost your validity, why should I continue to listen to anything else you have to say?

[macgyver12345678]

@iamspid3rman Also, if there's anything that has a chance of explaining everything, it's science. Pretty good track record. 'God did it' isn't really explaining anything is it? it's actually assuming complexity far greater than what we're trying to account for. I have faith you'll find the light.