Top Comments
All Comments (277)
-
I cannot morally nor intellectually justify glossing over something as obviously phony as the Official Fable. I agree with Stef up to a point here -- it can indeed be detrimental to rabidly focus on 9/11 when other, more solid examples of State evil are available. But I emphatically disagree with the "meh -- let's just ignore 9/11" position.
-
This video is very thought provoking :)
Keep up the good work Stefbot :)
-
See Simon Shack's September Clues, there were no planes on 911, they were JASSM missiles.
NO PLANES ON 911
NO PLANES on 9/11
-
@stefbot: It's not just about the 3,000 American lives lost, but all the crimes against humanity & all lives lost because of 911. It's the way 911 was used to justify pre-emptive wars by scaring people into the thought proccess of "we gotta get them over there before they get us over here." It's about the loss of liberties through the patriot act. All these things would not have been accepted by the American people with out the shock and awe of 911. Watch "War by Deception" on youtube.
-
Classy!
-
@TSMPimpDaddyPain Agreed. There are a plenty of discrepancies in the 9/11 story. Why are we forced to accept the 'official' story but forbidden to question how passports survive infernos and media predict buildings free falling due to fire hours prior the fact. You can't ignore the signs and if you start with 9/11 everything else should come crumbling down.
-
Bla bla bla bla! Where's the beef? you sound very much like a globalist shill to me. You talk alot but there's no substance. Kind of like fox news.
-
Bla bla bla bla! Where's the beef?
-
@heartnsoulband You're an expert? Me too. I'm an expert, and I say you're wrong. I win.
-
@JonRevere I am an expert in the field of high rise construction, and I have spent 3 years diligently researching 9/11....You don't know what you are talking about! Period!



The WTC Demolition hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory. It is a scientific hypothesis that fits all known scientific data and experimentation.
The government and NIST have no scientific hypothesis that would point to the WTC being destroyed by the jets.
Period.
"freedom is the ability to say 2 plus 2 is 4"
We can apply the scientific method and show demolition to be the answer. Why "truthers" get upset is because talks like this try and tell us we have to say 2 plus 2 is 7.
seandulac 2 years ago 9
Interesting take, Stef. In my opinion, the reason some people "focus" on 9/11 as you say, is because without it....there would be no Patriot Act, several massive spying intelligence agencies, molestations at airports, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. Our gov.'t, regardless of their level of involvement, used 9/11 as a pretext and excuse to engage in all these activities.
TSMPimpDaddyPain 11 months ago 5