Re: Emergence - Part 1B of ?
Loading...
Loading...
114
views
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 15:27A window on ancient Rome 1:3by thomasmatus115 views
- 6:46A window on ancient Rome 3:3by thomasmatus108 views
- 7:25Emergence - Part 1B of ?by SpiritualAtheist265 views
- 2:48emergent properties and reductionismby himrdo572 views
- 8:51Experienceby thomasmatus319 views
- 3:11Matus_Alien-Sacred-Dances_1of7by thomasmatus260 views
- 7:36Emergence - Part 2A of ?by SpiritualAtheist236 views
- 7:08My PARANORMAL Experiences! :)by BeautyCreep3,685 views
- 6:51Understanding Consciousness Part 1: A Scientist...by qeegsupport2,238 views
- 1:45Emergence - On Stageby nationalballetcanada1,693 views
- 6:34Miracles & Free Will (1/10)by SpiritualAtheist654 views
- 3:57Spontaneous order in people, markets, societies...by germanjournal4,664 views
- 4:25Invincible + Waajeed - "Detroit Summer"/"Emerge...by EMERGENCEmedia31320,213 views
- 1:02IB Biology 2.1.7 Emergent Properties of Multice...by IBguides2,505 views
- 7:12A window on ancient Rome 2:3by thomasmatus53 views
- 5:50Trifonic - Emergence (Unofficial video)by kerik868,335 views
- 11:143.2 Emergent Properties of Waterby gmcd19852,331 views
- 4:53Emergence (NOVA 1-2)by BonoboBill8,902 views
- 5:44Emergence See - Daniel Beaty @ the Apolloby dwdefreitas61,536 views
- 5:30Catwoman: Re-Emergence (Catwoman Summer Project)by almtalkies22,002 views
I agree we are all interconnected at a deep level, but this works only on the basis of some playform of shunyatavada.
As for sankhya, the subtle levels all belong firmly to prakrti and are hence incapable to interconnect the purusha. In fact, since prakrti is inconscient by itself and purusha is unchangeable, nothing could ever connect or know anything at all. This extreme sankhya dualism simply doesn't make any sense at all until purusha and prakrti are "shunyatafied".
LooksAeterna 1 year ago
Cognitio atque causarum! Great video responce. Conscienctia
MaBu888 3 years ago
Very poignant remarks. It is crucial that in trying to understand consciousness we don't neglect its transactional origins. It is rather easy to toss out the Cartesian notion of an objectively existing world, only to keep the notion of an isolated subject. I think both of these notions rise and fall together, and that it would be best for us to leave them both behind. Moving out of the Cartesian paradigm requires a complete reappraisal of the idea that consciousness begins and ends in the skull.
0ThouArtThat0 3 years ago