Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Empire classic or empire lite?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,733
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 3, 2008

More at http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=102

Obama foreign policy does not question basic assumptions of the past

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • there was no need for prediction

    He has always threatened Iran

    He threatened Russia During the Georgian conflict

    He threatened Pakistan

    He voted for FISA

    He voted for the Bailouts

    He has always maintained that we will maintain a " presence " in Iraq

    He even changed his " Universal " healthcare rhetoric to " affordable " healthcare

    There was no need for predictions, Chomsky knew what he was doing.

  • Man. I wish Ralph Nader, Mike Gravel, and Dennis Kucinich were the ones running this country because if that was so... then the PEOPLE would be running this country~

    TRUTH!

see all

All Comments (110)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Msgrv32 Iraq is already comparable to Somalia, we cannot create change in either Iraq, Afghanistan or Somalia until we truly understand the problem. Its not terrorism, terrorism is simply reactionary to social stratification inherent in these countries. However i feel this more likely reflects on the Roman occupation of Gaul.

  • Iraq will never become Somalia, making the argument that it will is very silly.

    Silly!

  • Fuck Aipac

  • way to burst my obama bubble hahaha, it was good while it lasted...

  • Pullling out of Iraq is the right thing to do. But if the US pulls out fast and Iraq collapses into a failed state like Somalia, Islamic civil war and extremism will pioson the middle East.

    Afghanistan is already falling apart, and to stabilise the country terrorists havens in pakistan must be wiped out.

    Obama is being practical. He didnt start these war but he knows that if he ends them irresponsibly the US and many other countries will pay dearly.

    He has to clean up the mess not walk away.

  • lol! right on!

  • LOL! God help us (protect us from your most ardent of followers!)!!!

  • LOL that's highly unlikely. When that year rolls around you'll blow off the dust from those Obama signs and start campaigning for him once again. why you ask, two words: Sarah Palin.

  • you should be looking at a spectrum of anarchy (no govt) to monarchy/oligarchy (total govt control). fascist and socialist require total govt control. Our republic is/was set up to protect the 49% from the 51% (democracy). There are many videos/books on the subject. A democracy/socialism is the worst form of govt, because the many (51%) can dictate what the few (49%) can do & that's why I equate fascim and socialism in which individual freedoms don't exist. Capiche?

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more