@MrThePwnisher Good. Feel comfident. You can sit behind you computerscreen, look at the number of killings, and then tell people that's worth the price, i don't care, it's not my damn country.
Then do you want me to send a message to you? I need a go signal, instead on an ad hominem argument. I can't post them in the comments to see, even if I want to, and I really want to.
Also, as for historical facts, I can't just rely on that. You can't fight facts and statistics, right? Provide it.
Oh. So now you went from trying to be logical to discrediting your opponent by calling him a "troll" and "an idiot", simply because of the profile picture?
How logical and mild mannered of a pro-control, eh?
@IvanTheMouse I should have seen your profile photo a long time ago. I should have know you were just being a troll. If you think your pictures are a slam dunk for your argument, just friggen share them and get over with it.
As for the crime rates in the UK, it is simply historical fact. Im not going to give you a lesson in British history. You can do that yourself, but it is simply a part of history that crime began to rise just short of half a decade after the end of WWII.
"I said that without evidence, it is a null argument." Yet, you dismissed the sourced pictures, which you said are irrelevant just because they are not statements, because you think they are forged. I could sent two to you and five others ready on my disposal, even more.
@IvanTheMouse ...I said that without evidence, it is a null argument. I stated historical facts. I am not your teacher or your mother, you can read up on the extensive history of the UK, if you wanted to. Don't take my word for it. As for recent crime rate sources, it has been plastered all over the UK news media. A quick google search will get you just some of the sources that back the argument.
@IvanTheMouse Way to quote mine my argument. You'll have to work on your debating skills. Saying you have sources, and providing them are two different things. % comments after, and you still have not published any. Next, you are completely missing the point of my argument. Crime was rising way BEFORE your gun law argument. So you are drawing conclusions which are incorrect, simply because you want to ignore the socio-economics conditions of the country. As for the "irony"...
Also, by saying "So your "pictures" say nothing of value in this debate." but stating earlier that "Saying that my statements are not true, without evidence, also doe snot disprove my statements.", you are contradicting yourself. You dismiss my arguments when I have sources, while considering yours valid when they are uncited.
By the way, my sources trace back to the British Home Office.
@MrThePwnisher Good. Feel comfident. You can sit behind you computerscreen, look at the number of killings, and then tell people that's worth the price, i don't care, it's not my damn country.
willthedumbass 2 days ago
@tharealkovo
Then do you want me to send a message to you? I need a go signal, instead on an ad hominem argument. I can't post them in the comments to see, even if I want to, and I really want to.
Also, as for historical facts, I can't just rely on that. You can't fight facts and statistics, right? Provide it.
IvanTheMouse 1 week ago
@tharealkovo
Oh. So now you went from trying to be logical to discrediting your opponent by calling him a "troll" and "an idiot", simply because of the profile picture?
How logical and mild mannered of a pro-control, eh?
IvanTheMouse 1 week ago
@IvanTheMouse I would not resort to it if you weren't an idiot, who is simply trying to troll me.
tharealkovo 1 week ago
@IvanTheMouse I should have seen your profile photo a long time ago. I should have know you were just being a troll. If you think your pictures are a slam dunk for your argument, just friggen share them and get over with it.
As for the crime rates in the UK, it is simply historical fact. Im not going to give you a lesson in British history. You can do that yourself, but it is simply a part of history that crime began to rise just short of half a decade after the end of WWII.
tharealkovo 1 week ago
@tharealkovo
As for this...
"Way to quote mine my argument. You'll have to work on your debating skills."
Talking like an expert and condescending to the other side will only make you look good, not make you logical.
IvanTheMouse 1 week ago
@tharealkovo
"I said that without evidence, it is a null argument." Yet, you dismissed the sourced pictures, which you said are irrelevant just because they are not statements, because you think they are forged. I could sent two to you and five others ready on my disposal, even more.
IvanTheMouse 1 week ago
@IvanTheMouse ...I said that without evidence, it is a null argument. I stated historical facts. I am not your teacher or your mother, you can read up on the extensive history of the UK, if you wanted to. Don't take my word for it. As for recent crime rate sources, it has been plastered all over the UK news media. A quick google search will get you just some of the sources that back the argument.
tharealkovo 1 week ago
@IvanTheMouse Way to quote mine my argument. You'll have to work on your debating skills. Saying you have sources, and providing them are two different things. % comments after, and you still have not published any. Next, you are completely missing the point of my argument. Crime was rising way BEFORE your gun law argument. So you are drawing conclusions which are incorrect, simply because you want to ignore the socio-economics conditions of the country. As for the "irony"...
tharealkovo 1 week ago
@tharealkovo
Also, by saying "So your "pictures" say nothing of value in this debate." but stating earlier that "Saying that my statements are not true, without evidence, also doe snot disprove my statements.", you are contradicting yourself. You dismiss my arguments when I have sources, while considering yours valid when they are uncited.
By the way, my sources trace back to the British Home Office.
IvanTheMouse 1 week ago